Skip to main content

Security report for termine-e.de

Evangelische Medienarbeit | EMA · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.termine-e.de is an online login portal for the 'termine-e' scheduling system operated by Evangelische Medienarbeit (EMA), a media organization in Germany. It serves registered users with max-e-Accounts, providing access to media scheduling and management tools. The site is professionally branded and targets media professionals or affiliated entities within the EMA ecosystem. The business model focuses on providing specialized online tools for media scheduling and support services. Technically, the site is built on Ruby on Rails with modern frontend assets like Font Awesome and Turbo, indicating a contemporary web infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and consistent branding. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF protection in forms, but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced security and compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy, secure, and professionally maintained, though improvements in privacy compliance and security headers are advised.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching termine-e.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Evangelische Medienarbeit operates this niche online scheduling platform targeting media professionals within its network. The partnership with systeme-e.de for support and the clear branding under EMA indicate a focused ecosystem. The business leverages digital tools to streamline media scheduling, likely generating value through service subscriptions or organizational funding. The absence of advertising and tracking suggests a privacy-conscious approach. The company maintains a small but specialized presence in the media sector in Germany, with a clear target audience and professional service offering. The partnership ecosystem includes systeme-e.de and the parent EMA organization, reinforcing trust and operational support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens implemented in forms, which protect against common web attacks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the defense-in-depth level. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The site does not display cookie consent mechanisms, which may be a GDPR compliance gap. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Evangelische Medienarbeit | EMA
Description
Online systems and tools provided by Evangelische Medienarbeit for media-related services and scheduling.
Key services
Online scheduling system (termine-e), Support and helpdesk for users
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Ruby on Rails, Font Awesome 6, Turbo (Hotwire), Active Storage
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for a media scheduling system.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at registered users with max-e-Account.
  3. Contact is provided via support email and help pages.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie banners detected on the login page.
  5. No visible security headers in HTML source; CSRF tokens present in forms.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media links found on the login page.
  8. Branding is consistent with Evangelische Medienarbeit.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Ruby on Rails framework, utilizing modern frontend technologies such as Font Awesome 6 and Turbo (Hotwire) for dynamic content loading. The presence of Active Storage indicates support for direct file uploads. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting responsive design for mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with deferred JavaScript loading and optimized CSS. However, no explicit hosting provider or CDN is identified. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features beyond basic form labeling. There is no CMS detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security header implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with termine-e.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review termine-e.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.