Skip to main content

Security report for tennistv.com

ATP Media Licensing Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tennis TV is the official ATP streaming service offering live tennis matches, full replays, and highlights in high definition. The platform targets tennis enthusiasts globally, providing subscription-based access to premium tennis content. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, mobile optimization, and comprehensive content relevant to its audience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including service workers, lazy loading, and cookie consent management, ensuring a good user experience and compliance with privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable risk factor, requiring further verification to confirm domain legitimacy. Overall, Tennis TV presents a trustworthy and professional service with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of tennistv.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tennistv.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tennis TV operates as a key player in the sports media streaming sector, leveraging official ATP branding to establish market authority. Its business model centers on subscription streaming, targeting tennis fans who seek live and on-demand tennis content. The platform integrates with ATP Tour's ecosystem, enhancing its competitive advantage. The company maintains a strong social media presence across multiple platforms, supporting brand engagement and marketing efforts. While direct contact information is limited on the site, the presence of comprehensive legal and privacy documentation supports regulatory compliance. The lack of WHOIS data is unusual for a large media entity and should be investigated to ensure domain ownership and reduce risk. The site’s technical infrastructure supports scalability and user engagement, positioning it well for growth in digital sports media.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms consistent with GDPR requirements, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure channels limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers are partially inferred but not explicitly confirmed, suggesting an opportunity to strengthen HTTP response headers for enhanced protection. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks and service workers is positive but requires ongoing monitoring for library vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from improved documentation and proactive disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  3. Implement and confirm comprehensive HTTP security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information availability to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ATP Media Licensing Ltd.
Description
Official ATP streaming service. Join Tennis TV today and enjoy live tennis in 1080 HD, plus thousands of full match replays and highlights on demand.
Key services
Live tennis streaming, Full match replays, Highlights on demand, Tournament schedules, Player information, Watchlist and classic matches
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Service Workers, SVG icons, Lazy loading images
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of service workers for progressive web app

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong branding aligned with ATP tennis streaming service.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. WHOIS data missing, raising questions about domain registration status.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools is evident.
  8. Social media presence is extensive and consistent with brand.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with asynchronous JavaScript loading, service workers for PWA capabilities, and lazy loading for images to optimize performance. Google Tag Manager and OneTrust are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management, supporting privacy compliance and marketing analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with good optimization practices but could be improved with further resource minification and caching strategies. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium12 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tennistv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tennistv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.