Skip to main content

Security report for tena.lv

TENA · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TENA Latvia is a localized website representing the TENA brand, which specializes in innovative products for urinary incontinence. The site targets mature audiences seeking comfort and solutions for incontinence issues. The business is positioned as a leading healthcare brand under the parent company Essity, offering a range of absorptive products and advice. The website demonstrates a moderate to high level of digital maturity, employing modern JavaScript libraries, consent management tools, and analytics services. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and Content Security Policy headers, though some advanced security policies and incident response disclosures are absent. Overall, the site is professional, GDPR compliant, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tena.lv

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TENA operates in the healthcare sector focusing on incontinence products, serving a niche but significant market segment. The business model revolves around product sales supported by educational content and customer support. The website is part of a global network of regional TENA sites, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem under Essity. The brand enjoys strong market positioning with consistent branding and trust signals such as privacy compliance and cookie consent. Growth opportunities lie in expanding digital engagement and enhancing direct contact channels. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled customer interactions via forms.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, Content Security Policy, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks publicly disclosed security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected in the analysis. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is extensive but managed through consent frameworks. Recommendations include publishing security policies, adding security headers like HSTS and X-Frame-Options, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel to enhance security culture and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as HSTS and X-Frame-Options for enhanced protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Increase direct contact options with verified company emails and phone numbers for customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TENA
Description
TENA piedāvā inovatīvus produktus urīna nesaturēšanai, kas palīdz miljoniem vīriešu & sieviešu sadzīvot ar urīna nesaturēšanu un justies komfortabli.
Key services
urine incontinence products, absorptive pads, adult diapers, advice and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Consent Management, New Relic Browser Monitoring
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser Monitoring, Yahoo Analytics, Quantserve
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Quantserve, Yahoo Analytics, New Relic
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with strong Content Security Policy headers.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact via form only.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Website content is professional, focused on healthcare products for urinary incontinence.
  8. Multiple external trusted domains used for analytics, consent, and content delivery.
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains detected.
  10. No adult or NSFW content present; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for consent management, indicating a well-maintained technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, and lazy loading for images. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility basics in place. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were identified. The extensive use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate risks. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and reduce technical debt by consolidating scripts and optimizing load times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tena.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tena.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.