Skip to main content

Security report for templarske-sklepy.cz

Templářské sklepy Čejkovice vinařské družstvo · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Templářské sklepy Čejkovice vinařské družstvo is a Czech winery specializing in traditional grape cultivation and wine production. The company operates an e-commerce platform selling wines and offers winery tours and tastings, positioning itself as a regional leader with historical branding linked to the Templar knights. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes age verification to comply with alcohol sales regulations. The business targets adult wine consumers and tourists interested in winery experiences. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, with moderate performance and good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and form validation but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and business presence appear legitimate. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching templarske-sklepy.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
62
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors focused on alcoholic beverages, specifically wine. Its business model combines direct sales via an online shop and physical retail locations, supplemented by experiential services like winery tours. The brand leverages historical and cultural themes to differentiate itself in a competitive market. The presence of awards and consistent branding supports a moderate market position. The company targets adult consumers in the Czech Republic and possibly neighboring regions. The website integrates marketing and retargeting tools to drive sales and customer engagement. Lack of detailed WHOIS data and limited contact information online may impact trust for new customers. The business appears medium-sized with a focused product and service offering.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes an age verification overlay to restrict access to users under 18, reflecting compliance with alcohol sales regulations. Use of Foxentry for form validation enhances input security. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published. Third-party scripts for analytics and marketing introduce potential risk vectors if not regularly audited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding privacy policy details and cookie consent mechanisms.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and broaden user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Templářské sklepy Čejkovice vinařské družstvo
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Templářské sklepy Čejkovice vinařské družstvo
Description
Tradiční pěstování hroznů a výroba vína je pro nás věcí cti, úcty, nadšení ale i pýchy z vykonané práce.
Key services
Wine production and sales, E-shop for wine purchase, Winery tours and tastings, Physical retail stores
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, jCarousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Foxentry (form validation and anti-fraud), LazyLoad
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification overlay for alcohol sales
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Foxentry for form security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear branding and product offerings.
  3. Age verification is implemented for alcohol sales compliance.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond basic legal documents.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or footer; contact likely via contact page.
  6. Use of multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Slick Carousel, jCarousel, and lazy loading for images, indicating a moderately modern front-end stack. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. Foxentry is used for form validation and anti-fraud measures. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with templarske-sklepy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review templarske-sklepy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.