Skip to main content

Security report for technobridge.eu

3ENITH · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

3ENITH is a specialized online payment processing company offering services and consulting expertise primarily for e-commerce acquirers. The company emphasizes cost efficiency, fast project management for Visa/Mastercard integrations, and a rich set of payment functionalities including tokenization and recurring payments. Their business model focuses on transaction-based fees and personalized consulting, targeting financial institutions and payment processors. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, leveraging WordPress CMS, modern JavaScript libraries, and integrated analytics and consent management tools. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and GDPR compliance mitigate some risk. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations, but further verification of domain registration is recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching technobridge.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

3ENITH positions itself as a niche player in the payment processing sector, targeting e-commerce acquirers with a focus on operational cost reduction and technical integration speed. Their competitive advantages include a lower operational prime cost than market average, free and quick merchant onboarding, and comprehensive back office reporting. The company leverages partnerships with major payment networks like Visa and Mastercard and offers consulting services to streamline payment project launches. The business model is B2B with revenue primarily from transaction fees and consulting. The presence of client testimonials and a CEO LinkedIn profile adds credibility. However, the lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers and missing WHOIS data suggest areas for improvement in transparency and trust-building.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy and security compliance. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The site uses up-to-date analytics and tracking tools with clear cookie categorization and user consent options, supporting GDPR compliance. Incident response and security policy information are not present, which could be improved to demonstrate readiness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional headers and explicit security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish explicit terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance trust and communication.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to confirm domain legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
3ENITH
Description
We provide online payment processing services and consulting expertise for eCom acquirers under high tech standards and win-win strategy.
Key services
Online payment processing, Consulting for Visa/Mastercard projects, Merchant onboarding, Back office reporting, Technical integration via RESTful API
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Swiper.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll), WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress theme framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google AdWords, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and focused on payment processing services.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy page URL found but privacy info is embedded in cookie consent and references.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. Contact information is limited to contact form and LinkedIn profile; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  8. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and AOS for animations. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and analytics, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads external fonts from Adobe Typekit and uses CDN resources for performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but continuous updates and security patching are recommended to maintain stability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with technobridge.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review technobridge.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.