Skip to main content

Security report for techdesign.se

Techdesign i Göteborg AB · Energy · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Techdesign i Göteborg AB is a small Swedish consulting company specializing in infrastructure-related services such as drilling profiles, traffic arrangement plans (TA-Plans), project planning, and construction management. The company positions itself as a professional and experienced technical consultancy with strong references and partnerships in the energy and transportation sectors, primarily serving clients in Göteborg, Sweden. Their website reflects a professional digital presence built on the Wix platform, featuring clear branding and partner affiliations. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including React and Webpack, hosted on Wix's infrastructure, and performs well with basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and some security best practices in place, but lacks explicit security headers and formal policies. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which is a notable gap given GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and SEO improvements to strengthen compliance and visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching techdesign.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a niche technical consultancy focused on infrastructure projects, offering a range of services from project planning to site management and inspections. Their business model relies on providing expert consulting services to infrastructure clients, supported by a network of reputable partners such as Rejlers, Göteborg Energi, Telia, and Sweco. The website highlights these partnerships, reinforcing credibility and market positioning. The target audience includes infrastructure developers and contractors in Sweden. The company appears to be small in size, with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. The website content is professionally crafted, supporting a good user experience and clear communication of services. However, the lack of privacy and security policies may impact trust for privacy-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. It includes scripts that handle cookies with some security considerations, but no explicit security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and incident response information indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Improve SEO by removing the 'noindex' meta tag on key pages and enhancing meta descriptions and structured data.
  4. Include a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to provide clear channels for security incident reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience across devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Techdesign i Göteborg AB
Registration number
559061-1298
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Techdesign i Göteborg AB
Description
Techdesign är ett konsultbolag som erbjuder tjänster så som framtagning av Borrprofiler, TA-Planer samt projektering inom infrastruktur.
Key services
Projektering, Projektledning, Arbetsledning, TA-Planer, Ledningslägen / Samlingskartor, Borrprofiler, Besiktning & Stickprov, Byggledning / Markavtalshantering, Anbudskalkyler
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, React, Webpack, Wix Thunderbolt platform
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Wix
Performance
fast
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie handling scripts with security considerations
  • Content Security Policy not explicitly found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Wix BI, Fedops
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with professional design
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found despite GDPR relevance
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  4. Strong partner logos and links indicate established business relationships
  5. SEO is limited due to 'noindex' meta tag and minimal meta descriptions
  6. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response info found
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts beyond Wix analytics observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using React and Webpack, leveraging Wix's Thunderbolt rendering engine and hosted on Wix's Parastorage CDN. The site loads quickly and uses modern JavaScript libraries and polyfills for compatibility. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is limited due to the 'noindex' directive and minimal meta tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and skip links present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but the site could benefit from improved SEO and accessibility enhancements to maximize reach and usability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with techdesign.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review techdesign.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.