Skip to main content

Security report for teamskeet.com

Teamskeet · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TeamSkeet is a prominent adult entertainment website offering a large collection of exclusive premium pornographic video series and content. The platform targets adult consumers seeking subscription-based access to high-quality adult videos featuring various models and series. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies such as React, multiple analytics tools (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar), and advertising networks integrated for monetization. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, indicating stable hosting and delivery. Despite good technical implementation and content quality, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts privacy compliance and user trust. No explicit contact or security incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and responsiveness to security concerns.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamskeet.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TeamSkeet operates in the adult media sector with a subscription-based business model focusing on premium video content. It maintains a strong market position with a large volume of exclusive series and collaborations with adult content creators. The platform leverages multiple advertising and tracking technologies to optimize revenue and user engagement. Social media presence on Twitter and Instagram supports brand visibility. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may affect user trust and regulatory compliance. The business appears large-scale with professional branding and consistent content delivery, but could improve transparency and compliance to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of scripts to enhance performance and security. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no visible privacy or cookie policy with consent mechanisms, which are critical for GDPR and other privacy regulations. The extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and potential privacy risks. The absence of contact information for security incidents or data protection officers limits incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse and security email addresses, to improve incident response capabilities.
  4. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency by publishing WHOIS data or using verified domain registration to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teamskeet
Description
TeamSkeet is the best and largest collection of exclusive premium porn series and videos on the Internet. Start watching now at TeamSkeet.com!
Key services
Premium pornographic video streaming, Exclusive series and collaborations, Access to multiple adult content series and models
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (indicated by react-helmet usage), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Convertexperiments, Async JavaScript loading, CDN usage (psmcdn.net, googletagmanager.com)
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of async script loading to improve performance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
psmads.psmcode.com
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Convertexperiments
Marketing tools
Convertexperiments
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult entertainment platform with extensive video content and model profiles.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No explicit contact information or security incident response contacts found.
  4. Heavy use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered in WHOIS database, which is unusual for an active commercial site.
  6. Content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily React, with extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising services. The asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDNs indicate a focus on performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data. However, the lack of detected security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and regulatory adherence. Hosting provider details are not explicit, and WHOIS data is missing, which could pose risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for content delivery but requires enhancements in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamskeet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamskeet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.