Skip to main content

Security report for teamoneymedia.com

Team Money Media · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team Money Media operates a customer support website focused on providing confidential and secure assistance to its members regarding membership status, transaction confirmations, and technical issues. The business appears to be a small media-related entity founded in 2014, with a niche market position serving its membership base. The website infrastructure relies on Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted by mojohost.com, and uses Tucows Domains Inc. for domain registration. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for compliance and security. Payment processing partnerships with Vend-o.com and SegPay.com are evident, indicating a structured payment ecosystem.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teamoneymedia.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets members requiring support for their subscriptions and transactions, operating a membership-based business model. The website content is basic but functional, with clear links to privacy and terms policies, though lacking in direct contact information and cookie compliance. The partnership with known payment processors suggests legitimate revenue streams. The business maintains a moderate trust level but could improve transparency and contact accessibility to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with domain transfer protections enabled but missing DNSSEC and security headers. No HTTPS status was explicitly confirmed from the data, which is a critical factor. The absence of cookie consent and security policies reduces compliance maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating gaps in security governance. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, enforcing HTTPS, and implementing privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations across the site.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations like GDPR.
  5. Publish clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve trust and customer service.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team Money Media
Description
Provides safe, secure, and confidential online support services for members related to membership status, transaction confirmations, and technical assistance.
Key services
Membership status information, Transaction confirmation, Technical support
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website serves as a customer support portal for Team Money Media members.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. Privacy and terms policies are linked but cookie policy and consent are missing.
  4. No social media links or physical addresses provided.
  5. No forms present on the main page; support ticket system and cancellation links redirect externally.
  6. No advanced security headers or explicit security policies found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Website uses Bootstrap and jQuery for UI and responsiveness.
  9. Hosting via mojohost.com with domain registered through Tucows Domains Inc.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard Bootstrap framework with jQuery for frontend functionality, indicating a conventional and moderately modern tech stack. Hosting is provided by mojohost.com, a known hosting provider. The site performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS or advanced platform detected, suggesting a custom or static site. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teamoneymedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teamoneymedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.