Skip to main content

Security report for team-planet.com

Team for the Planet · Energy · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Team for the Planet is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to combating climate change by creating and financing innovative businesses globally. The website positions the company as a citizen-driven movement with a strong community of shareholders and innovators. Their business model focuses on crowdfunding and direct investment in climate solutions, emphasizing transparency and open-source principles. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as Turbo and StimulusJS, integrates analytics tools like Matomo and Plausible, and demonstrates excellent design and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though improvements like DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching team-planet.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
77
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a broad audience including individual citizens, companies, NGOs, and innovators, offering multiple engagement paths such as shareholding, innovation submission, and community participation. Their market position is unique as a global citizen-led climate investment platform with transparent governance and scientific oversight. Revenue streams derive from share purchases and reinvestment of profits into new innovations. The partnership ecosystem includes community platforms and recruitment sites. Growth indicators include a rapidly expanding shareholder base and significant funds raised. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining transparency and expanding community engagement to scale impact.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF tokens, and domain transfer protection. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for enhancement. There is no explicit security policy or incident response information published, which could improve trust and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is good for a non-profit organization, but adopting additional best practices would strengthen defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and communication with security researchers.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit analytics and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Team for the Planet
Description
A not-for-profit company that creates and finances businesses fighting climate change on a global scale.
Key services
Financing climate innovations, Shareholder investment opportunities, Community engagement and events, Innovation assessment and development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, YouTube iframe API, Matomo analytics, Plausible analytics, Google Fonts, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Turbo (Hotwire), StimulusJS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Plausible
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Plausible
Marketing tools
Matomo Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-designed, professional platform for a climate-focused non-profit business.
  2. Strong emphasis on transparency, open source, and community involvement.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  5. Some minor security improvements possible (DNSSEC, security headers).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including Turbo and StimulusJS, providing a fast and responsive user experience. Integration with YouTube iframe API and analytics platforms like Matomo and Plausible indicates a well-rounded digital infrastructure. The site uses SVG graphics and Google Fonts for visual appeal and performance. Hosting details are limited but domain registration is with Gandi SAS. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal, though adding DNSSEC and security headers would reduce attack surface and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with team-planet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review team-planet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.