Skip to main content

Security report for tcgls.com

TCG Lifesciences Pvt. Limited · Healthcare · India

Partial score · DNS & email only

51/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TCG Lifesciences Pvt. Limited is a well-established global Contract Research and CDMO company specializing in pharmaceutical and biotech R&D services. Founded in 2001 and headquartered in India, the company operates internationally with subsidiaries such as Clininvent Research Pvt. Ltd. Their service portfolio includes chemistry synthesis, pharmacology, DMPK, analytical development, and manufacturing. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern UI frameworks and SEO optimizations. However, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate is a critical security gap that undermines user trust and data protection. While security headers are present, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols significantly reduces the security posture. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms and terms of service. Overall, the business credibility is strong, supported by certifications and social proof, but technical and security improvements are necessary to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tcgls.com

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
51

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tcgls.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
43
Employees
2
Customers
3
Third parties
38
Weak passwords
49%

Latest record dated 2026-03-30 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tcgls.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –webmail.tcgls.com2026-03-30
  • –webmail.tcgls.com2025-07-07

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets pharmaceutical and biotech firms requiring outsourced R&D and manufacturing services. Their integrated platform approach and global footprint position them competitively in the CRO/CDMO market. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and specialized service units indicates a diversified business model with growth potential. The website's content and structure support lead generation and client engagement through detailed service descriptions and multiple contact forms. Social media integration and news updates enhance brand visibility. The lack of explicit terms of service and cookie policies may pose compliance risks in certain jurisdictions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with several HTTP security headers and a content security policy. However, the invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant vulnerabilities that expose users to data interception and trust issues. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption further impacts performance and security. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. The site uses CAPTCHA on forms to mitigate spam. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security policies are recommended to improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Implement a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and compliance.
  5. Add incident response contact information and consider appointing a Data Protection Officer.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TCG Lifesciences Pvt. Limited
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with PHP 8.0 and uses Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 3.3.1 for frontend UI. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting is behind Cloudflare CDN with GoDaddy DNS. Performance metrics are not available but inferred as slow due to large page resources and multiple plugins. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. The site uses multiple plugins for forms, news ticker, and popups. Technical debt includes outdated Bootstrap version and lack of HTTPS. Modernization and performance optimization are advised.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tcgls.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tcgls.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.