Skip to main content

Security report for tcd.com

TCD - The Credit Department · Finance · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Credit Department (TCD) is a specialized Accounts Receivable management firm offering comprehensive AR automation, consulting, and managed services primarily targeting mid-market and enterprise clients. Established in 1992, TCD positions itself as a market leader with over 30 years of experience optimizing cash flow and receivables processes across more than 100 industries. Their flagship product, SMART, integrates with major ERP systems and customer payment portals to provide real-time data and automation capabilities. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress and Elementor, with good SEO, mobile optimization, and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. Overall, TCD demonstrates a credible and professional online presence aligned with its business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tcd.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TCD operates in the finance sector, focusing on trade receivables management and AR automation. Their business model combines software solutions with expert consulting and managed services, targeting CFOs, CEOs, and private equity managers. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with ERP providers and payment portals to enhance service delivery. Their market position as a pioneer in AR management and extensive industry coverage provides competitive advantages. The website content and structured data indicate a well-established company with a clear value proposition and strong trust signals such as case studies and testimonials. The partnership with Virbion for website technology suggests a professional approach to digital infrastructure.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers, indicating a solid baseline security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms use nonce tokens for security. However, the absence of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could improve security communication. Tracking and marketing scripts are used responsibly with privacy policies in place. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and formal incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance and user privacy control.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form input validation and monitoring to prevent injection or abuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
The Credit Department, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TCD - The Credit Department
Description
The leading AR solution for Mid-Market and Enterprise. Helping companies optimize Accounts Receivable and Cash Flow since 1993.
Key services
AR Automation, Managed AR Services, Trade Receivables Management, Consulting, Risk Assessment, Deductions and Disputes Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WooCommerce, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Zoho SalesIQ, Ultimate Elementor, SiteGround Optimizer
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with nonce tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Zoho SalesIQ, PageSense
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Zoho SalesIQ, PageSense
Marketing tools
Elementor Marketing Buttons, Zoho SalesIQ
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on Accounts Receivable solutions for mid-market and enterprise clients.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, address, and contact forms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress with Elementor).
  5. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. Active use of marketing and analytics tools with moderate tracking.
  10. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, and Google business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It leverages modern JavaScript libraries and integrates with multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Zoho SalesIQ, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and marketing. Hosting is provided by SiteGround with performance optimizations via SiteGround Optimizer plugin. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO optimization including structured data (JSON-LD) for organization, website, and articles. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and prefetching techniques. Technical risks are minimal but depend on maintaining plugin and script updates. The infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for further modernization in security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tcd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tcd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.