Skip to main content

Security report for taz.de

TAZ Verlags- und Vertriebs GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TAZ Verlags- und Vertriebs GmbH operates taz.de, a well-established German left-leaning independent news media website founded in 1992. The site offers critical journalism including analyses, commentaries, interviews, and reportages, targeting a general audience interested in progressive news. The business model combines subscription services and advertising revenue, supported by a cooperative structure. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern JavaScript frameworks like Alpine.js, Cash DOM, and uses Google Publisher Tag for advertising and Matomo for analytics. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well implemented, providing a good user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms for cookies, though explicit security headers could be confirmed. Privacy compliance is robust with clear privacy and cookie policies in German, aligned with GDPR requirements. WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing legitimate domain registration and hosting in Berlin. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and secure, with no critical vulnerabilities detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taz.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention taz.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
729
Employees
7
Customers
642
Third parties
80
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2025-12-24 · 15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for taz.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –taz.de2025-12-24
  • –taz.de2025-12-23
  • –taz.de2025-11-01
  • –seafile.taz.de2025-07-20
  • –seafile.taz.de2025-07-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TAZ holds a strong market position as an independent left-wing news media outlet in Germany, leveraging a cooperative business model since 1992. Its revenue streams include subscriptions, advertising, and sales via its shop and e-paper platforms. The company maintains a broad digital presence across multiple social media platforms, enhancing audience engagement. The website content is rich and professionally curated, supporting its reputation and trustworthiness. The technical infrastructure supports scalability and modern web standards, indicating ongoing investment in digital maturity. Partnerships include advertising networks and analytics providers, with no suspicious or unrelated domains detected. The business shows signs of stability and growth potential within the media sector.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration, uses Google Publisher Tag with safe frame enforcement, and integrates a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options were not clearly identified in the provided data and should be verified. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly visible, which could be improved to enhance security transparency. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from formalized security policies and published contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against XSS and clickjacking.
  2. Provide a publicly accessible security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance visibility of contact information for security and privacy concerns on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising integrations to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TAZ Verlags- und Vertriebs GmbH
Description
Kritischer, unabhängiger Journalismus der linken Nachrichtenseite taz: Analysen, Hintergründe, Kommentare, Interviews, Reportagen. Genossenschaft seit 1992.
Key services
News articles, Commentaries, Interviews, Reportages, Subscription services, Advertising
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Cash DOM, Google Publisher Tag (GPT), Piwik/Matomo Analytics, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of secure cookies (implied)
  • Consent mechanism for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik/Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager (GPT)
Tracking pixels
Piwik/Matomo
Marketing tools
Google Publisher Tag, Piwik/Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional news media site with extensive content.
  2. Strong focus on user privacy and GDPR compliance.
  3. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  4. Advertising is managed via Google Ad Manager with consent mechanisms.
  5. No signs of malicious content or security issues.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent with the business and hosting location.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Alpine.js for reactive UI components, Cash DOM for lightweight DOM manipulation, and Google Publisher Tag for ad management. Analytics are handled via Matomo, supporting privacy-conscious tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloads fonts and images for performance. The CMS appears custom-built, tailored to the editorial needs of the publisher. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Accessibility features and SEO optimizations are well implemented, including meta tags, Open Graph, and structured JSON-LD data. Hosting details are not explicit but name servers indicate Berlin-based infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable news platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taz.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taz.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.