Skip to main content

Security report for tauron.pl

TAURON Polska Energia · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TAURON Polska Energia is a major Polish energy provider offering electricity and related services to residential and business customers. The website presents a comprehensive portfolio including energy supply, energy-saving devices, customer service, and digital tools such as an energy consumption calculator and e-invoice services. The branding and content quality are excellent, reflecting a professional and trusted energy company. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, consent management tools, and analytics platforms, with a CMS likely based on Sitecore. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and incident response information are not evident. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but is likely due to registry policies rather than malicious intent. Overall, the site is well-designed, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tauron.pl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TAURON operates in the energy sector in Poland, targeting both households and businesses. The company leverages digital channels to provide customer service and promote energy products such as photovoltaics, heating, and air conditioning solutions. The presence of multiple subdomains and partner sites indicates a broad ecosystem supporting various aspects of energy supply and customer engagement. The business model focuses on energy sales, device financing, and value-added services. The company maintains a strong market position with clear trust signals including certifications and official reports. Growth is supported by digital transformation and customer-centric offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of cookie consent management via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. Multiple analytics and marketing scripts are used, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No direct security policy or incident response contact is published, which is a gap in transparency. The absence of visible security headers in the provided data suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information for security issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance form security by adding CSRF tokens and robust input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Increase transparency by providing direct company contact details on the website for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TAURON Polska Energia
Description
TAURON Polska Energia to dostawca prądu dla domów i firm
Key services
Electricity supply, Energy devices (photovoltaics, heating, air conditioning), Customer service and billing, Energy consumption calculator, E-invoice services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1 and 3.6.0, RequireJS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Owl Carousel, Google Maps API, Facebook Pixel, Clarity (Microsoft), LazySizes
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Consent Mode implemented
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login link to external portal

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong branding consistent with a major Polish energy company.
  3. Multiple customer service and product offerings clearly presented.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on this page.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, RequireJS, Owl Carousel, and Google Maps API, integrated within a Sitecore CMS environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The site employs multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site is well maintained with consistent branding and professional design. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and streamline third-party script usage to reduce technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tauron.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tauron.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.