Skip to main content

Security report for tallinnrestaurantweek.ee

Tallinn Restaurant Week MTÜ · Hospitality · Estonia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tallinn Restaurant Week MTÜ operates a well-established hospitality event promoting fine dining experiences across over 100 restaurants in Tallinn, Estonia. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform, highlighting event dates, restaurant participation, awards, and green dining initiatives. The business targets general audiences interested in culinary experiences and positions itself as a reputable local event with international quality standards. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as SvelteKit and integrates common analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is performant, mobile-optimized, and professionally designed, though it lacks some advanced accessibility features and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and credible, with consistent WHOIS data supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, adding security headers, and publishing security policies to strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tallinnrestaurantweek.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on event marketing and promotion. It leverages partnerships with the city of Tallinn and hospitality associations to enhance credibility and reach. The event's longevity (24 editions) indicates stable market presence and community engagement. Revenue likely derives from restaurant participation fees and sponsorships. The target customer segment includes local residents and tourists seeking curated dining experiences. The website's partnership ecosystem includes official city websites and hospitality organizations, reinforcing its market position. Growth opportunities include expanding green dining initiatives and enhancing digital engagement through improved privacy and security features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Tracking scripts from third parties introduce moderate user tracking, which is not fully mitigated by cookie consent mechanisms. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with a privacy policy present but no explicit cookie consent or data protection officer contact. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but can be improved to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts or provide clear user opt-out options to improve privacy compliance.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tallinn Restaurant Week MTÜ
Description
Tallinn Restaurant Week is an event promoting fine dining experiences at over 100 restaurants in Tallinn, offering special menus at affordable prices during a specific week. It celebrates the city's culinary achievements and encourages green choices in dining.
Key services
Restaurant listings, Event information, Awards and recognitions, Green dining initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, SvelteKit
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the hospitality event.
  3. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage.
  4. Contact information is limited to email and social media links; no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  6. Security headers are not visible in the HTML content; likely configured at server level or missing.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript framework SvelteKit indicates up-to-date technical implementation.
  8. Tracking scripts from Google and Facebook are present, indicating moderate user tracking.
  9. No explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms beyond privacy policy link.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (SvelteKit) enabling fast loading and good mobile optimization. External resources include Google Fonts and analytics/tracking scripts from Google and Facebook. The site uses asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. No common CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based implementation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with minor areas for improvement in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tallinnrestaurantweek.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tallinnrestaurantweek.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.