Skip to main content

Security report for tails.lv

Tails Restaurant · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tails Restaurant is an upscale seafood dining establishment located in Riga, Latvia, specializing in innovative culinary techniques such as Dry-Aging fish. The website presents a professional and visually appealing digital presence built on the Tilda CMS platform, integrating reservation functionality via an external widget. The technical infrastructure includes modern tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, but lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but could be improved by adding security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is suitable for its business purpose but requires enhancements in privacy and security transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tails.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tails Restaurant targets seafood enthusiasts and fine dining customers in Riga, leveraging a business model focused on high-quality dining experiences and private events. The Head Chef's international credentials add competitive advantage. The website supports business operations with online reservations and multilingual support (Latvian and Russian). The marketing ecosystem includes Google Ads and Facebook retargeting, indicating active customer engagement strategies. However, the lack of explicit contact details and compliance policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics and advertising services. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact information suggests limited preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant gap under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file with incident response contacts to improve security transparency.
  4. Include clear company contact information such as email and phone numbers on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tails Restaurant
Description
TAILS is a seafood restaurant located in Riga’s Art Nouveau quarter, featuring a classic dining room, Raw Bar counter, Chef’s Table, and Private Event hall. The cuisine specializes in Dry-Aging fish to enhance texture and flavor. The Head Chef, Matīss, has international experience and focuses on innovative seafood dishes combining local ingredients.
Key services
Seafood dining, Raw Bar, Chef’s Table experience, Private events, Reservations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Tilda CMS scripts and styles
Frameworks
Tilda CMS
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google and Facebook tracking scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed restaurant site using Tilda CMS.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. HTTPS is enabled and used throughout the site.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  10. Reservation system integrated via external widget.tablein.com domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.10.2 and asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel scripts. Hosting is via Tilda's CDN infrastructure, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. The site uses modern web fonts and CSS animations for enhanced user experience. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations such as security headers and detailed privacy mechanisms, representing an area for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tails.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tails.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.