Skip to main content

Security report for tadychutna.cz

Tady chutná · Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tady Chutná is a hospitality business operating four distinct restaurants in the heart of Prague, specializing in traditional Czech and Austro-Hungarian cuisine. The brand emphasizes quality food, regional wines, and a rich historical ambiance, targeting both locals and tourists seeking authentic dining experiences. The parent company, Husičky s.r.o., manages these establishments with a focus on culinary heritage and customer satisfaction. The website serves as a central hub linking to each restaurant's dedicated site and provides daily menu offerings and contact information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive elements. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, alongside Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by Webglobe, consistent with the domain's WHOIS data. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search engine visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No forms are present for direct data collection, reducing attack surface, but the absence of privacy and terms of service documents represents a compliance gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could be improved to enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a medium-sized hospitality business, with good technical implementation and moderate privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in policy transparency and security posture would further strengthen its risk profile and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tadychutna.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tady Chutná occupies a niche in Prague's hospitality market by uniting four historically themed restaurants under one brand, leveraging culinary tradition and location advantages near major city landmarks. Their business model focuses on quality dining experiences with a curated selection of regional wines and beers, appealing to both local patrons and tourists. The company benefits from a cohesive brand identity and cross-promotion among its restaurants, supported by a centralized website linking to individual restaurant sites. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active social media presence. Partnerships with related restaurant domains suggest a tightly integrated operational ecosystem. Revenue streams likely derive from dine-in services, beverage sales, and possibly event hosting. The company maintains a medium size with clear legal registration and physical presence in Prague.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No forms or input fields are present, minimizing direct data exposure risks. The lack of published privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contacts represents compliance and transparency gaps. Tracking technologies like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used, which require clear user consent and data handling disclosures. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive policies, adding security headers, and establishing incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure GDPR compliance and minimize privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Husičky s.r.o.
Registration number
02849712
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tady chutná
Description
Nový koncept Tady Chutná spojuje čtyři pražské restaurace pod jedna křídla. Restaurace nabízejí tradiční a moderní českou a rakousko-uherskou kuchyni s důrazem na kvalitu jídla, vína a piva. Podniky mají historický a regionální charakter a jsou umístěny v centru Prahy.
Key services
Restaurace, Gastronomie, Prodej vína a piva, Denní nabídky jídel
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with automatic blocking mode.
  4. Contact information includes a company email and physical address in Prague.
  5. Multiple external links point to related restaurant websites under the same brand.
  6. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel.
  7. Website built on WordPress with standard plugins and libraries.
  8. No forms detected in the HTML content for direct user data collection.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. Good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform (version 6.8.1) with standard front-end technologies including jQuery 3.6.0 and Slick Carousel for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes, while Cookiebot manages cookie consent with automatic blocking. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement and has good mobile optimization. Hosting is provided by Webglobe, consistent with WHOIS data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy/legal documents, which are areas for technical improvement. No forms or direct user input fields reduce complexity and risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence suitable for a medium-sized hospitality business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tadychutna.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tadychutna.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.