Skip to main content

Security report for taborgroup.ie

Tabor Group · Healthcare · Ireland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tabor Group is a healthcare service provider specializing in residential addiction treatment based in Cork, Ireland. Established in 1989, the organization offers primary and integrated recovery programs targeting alcohol, drug, and gambling addictions. The website reflects a professional and trusted brand with a clear focus on addiction recovery services for individuals in Ireland. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and optimized with NitroPack, delivering good performance and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices. The lack of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching taborgroup.ie

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Tabor Group operates in the healthcare sector, specifically addiction treatment, serving individuals seeking recovery services in Ireland. Their market position is established and trusted, with over three decades of operation. The business model focuses on residential treatment programs, likely funded through private pay or healthcare partnerships. The website's content and branding are consistent and professional, targeting a general audience needing addiction support. The presence of social media links and use of modern CMS tools indicate a moderate digital maturity. However, the absence of detailed business registration or contact information on the site limits transparency. No related or partner domains were identified from the content provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the scripts loaded. The site lacks a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts, which are best practices for vulnerability disclosure and incident management. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, potentially exposing the organization to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable components are in use.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features and provide more detailed business contact information to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tabor Group
Description
Trusted residential addiction treatment in Cork since 1989. Primary & integrated recovery programmes for alcohol, drugs & gambling.
Key services
Residential addiction treatment, Primary recovery programmes, Integrated recovery programmes, Treatment for alcohol addiction, Treatment for drug addiction, Treatment for gambling addiction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, NitroPack, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available to verify domain registration details.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Social media links to Facebook and Twitter present via Open Graph metadata.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and NitroPack for performance optimization.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with good SSL configuration.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and optimized using NitroPack, indicating a modern and performance-focused technical infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for typography and analytics/tracking respectively. The site loads quickly and is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph metadata for social sharing. However, no hosting provider information was identified from the content. Accessibility is basic, and no advanced accessibility features were detected. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features are technical gaps. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but can be enhanced with improved security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with taborgroup.ie. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review taborgroup.ie.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.