Skip to main content

Security report for tablefever.com

TableFever · Hospitality · Belgium

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TableFever is a Belgian hospitality technology company offering a SaaS platform for restaurant reservations, catering, and takeaway management. The platform targets restaurants and consumers seeking seamless dining experiences, providing features such as reservation widgets, floor plans, bookings, gift vouchers, and customer contact management. The company integrates with notable partners like DPD Fresh and Teamleader to enhance service delivery. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, and is served over HTTPS with good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with encrypted connections, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness, suggesting a need for verification of domain registration. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tablefever.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TableFever occupies a niche in the hospitality sector, focusing on Belgian restaurants and consumers. Its SaaS business model leverages integrations with logistics and CRM partners to streamline restaurant operations and customer engagement. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive feature set tailored to restaurant workflows and its partnerships with recognized industry players. Revenue likely derives from subscription fees and transaction commissions. The company demonstrates growth potential through its ambassador program and integration ecosystem. Strategic observations include the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen market trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with EU cookie regulations and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability and compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
TableFever
VAT number
BE0559892314
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TableFever
Description
TableFever is a platform that helps users find and book restaurants nearby, offering restaurant reservation software and catering/takeaway solutions. It integrates with various tools and partners to streamline restaurant management and customer experience.
Key services
Restaurant reservations, Floor plans, Bookings, Gift vouchers, Contact management, Waiting lists, Order flows, Ranking and reviews
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Swiper.js, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate domain registration issues.
  3. Privacy and terms of service pages are present and comprehensive.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact likely via form.
  5. Multiple integrations with reputable partners and marketing tools.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite EU presence.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with no visible security issues.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integrations for analytics and marketing. It leverages Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for tracking and advertising. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Swiper.js for interactive sliders. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Performance is moderate with no major issues observed. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for modernization. The site structure and SEO metadata are well implemented, supporting good search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tablefever.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tablefever.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.