Skip to main content

Security report for tablefever.be

TableFever · Hospitality · Belgium

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TableFever is a Belgian hospitality technology company providing a SaaS platform for restaurant reservations, catering, and takeaway management. The platform targets restaurants and consumers seeking efficient booking and catering solutions, positioning itself as a key player in the Belgian market with integrations to notable partners like Google, Teamleader, and DPD fresh. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and offers comprehensive features and customer testimonials, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, with good performance and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and nonce-based script loading, though security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is restricted due to DNS Belgium policies, which is common and justified for privacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tablefever.be

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TableFever operates in the hospitality sector, offering a SaaS model that generates revenue through restaurant subscriptions and catering service facilitation. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive feature set, integrations with logistics and business tools, and a strong ambassador network of reputable restaurants. The platform targets both restaurants and end consumers, focusing on the Belgian market. Growth indicators include partnerships with recognized brands and a well-maintained digital presence. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to expand reach. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding privacy compliance and security policies to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of nonce attributes for scripts, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent banner, potentially exposing the company to GDPR non-compliance risks. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by adopting best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add an explicit cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and hosting a security.txt file.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
TableFever
VAT number
BE0559892314
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TableFever
Description
TableFever is a platform that helps users find and book restaurants nearby, offering restaurant reservation software and catering/takeaway solutions. It integrates with various tools and provides features like reservations, floor plans, bookings, gift vouchers, contact management, waiting lists, order flows, and ranking.
Key services
Restaurant reservation system, Catering and takeaway management, Gift voucher sales, Customer contact management, Order and booking flows
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce attributes in scripts for CSP

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No signs of WAF or security blocking.
  3. WHOIS data is restricted due to DNS Belgium policy, limiting registrant visibility.
  4. Strong presence of social media and partner integrations.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which is a compliance gap.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content; contact is via form and social media.
  7. Good use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site uses nonce attributes for inline scripts, indicating some Content Security Policy measures. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS platform but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tablefever.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tablefever.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.