Skip to main content

Security report for sziget.hu

#SZIGET2026 · Hospitality · Hungary

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Szigetfestival.com is the official website for the Sziget Festival, a major annual music and cultural festival held in Hungary. The website provides comprehensive information about the upcoming 2026 festival, including ticket preregistration, lineup details, festival guides, and streaming content. The site targets music fans and festival attendees globally, positioning itself as a leading European festival brand with a strong digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools integrated, including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good performance and accessibility standards. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent mechanism, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and long-standing presence of the festival brand.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sziget.hu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Sziget Festival operates in the hospitality and entertainment sector, focusing on large-scale event organization and ticket sales. Its business model revolves around annual festival hosting, leveraging a strong brand and international artist lineups to attract hundreds of thousands of attendees. The website supports this model by providing ticket preregistration and rich content to engage users. The festival has a significant market position in Europe, with a large audience and active social media channels. The digital ecosystem includes multilingual support and streaming services, indicating a mature and diversified approach to audience engagement. No direct business contact details or corporate registration information were found, which is common for event-focused websites but could be improved for transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and the domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risks of unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided content, which is a recommended best practice to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The site uses multiple analytics and tracking tools but defaults consent to denied, showing privacy-conscious behavior. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact information, which are areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact channels, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses, to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
#SZIGET2026
Description
Tarts velünk a Szigeten 2026-ban is! A Szabadság Szigete rengeteg meglepetéssel, világsztárral és változatos programmal vár.
Key services
Festival event hosting, Ticket preregistration and sales, Festival information and guides, Streaming festival content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, WPML (multilingual CMS plugin), Google Site Kit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is rich, relevant, and targeted to festival attendees.
  3. Strong social media integration and presence.
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Multiple analytics and tracking tools are used with consent defaults set to denied.
  8. Domain WHOIS data indicates a legitimate and long-standing registration.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging popular plugins like Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support. It uses Cloudflare for DNS services, which provides some level of protection and performance optimization. Analytics and user behavior tracking are implemented via Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity, with consent mechanisms in place. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Mobile optimization and accessibility are strong points. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content such as videos. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. The technical infrastructure is modern and supports the business needs effectively, though security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sziget.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sziget.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.