Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention sypsenaok.lt, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for sypsenaok.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
UAB IMPLANTOLOGIJOS IR ODONTOLOGIJOS KLINIKA „ŠYPSENA“ · Healthcare · Lithuania
High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.
UAB IMPLANTOLOGIJOS IR ODONTOLOGIJOS KLINIKA „ŠYPSENA“ operates as a modern dental clinic providing implantology and general odontological services primarily in Vilnius and Panevėžys, Lithuania. The website reflects a professional healthcare service provider with a clear focus on patient care and a broad range of dental treatments. The business targets local patients seeking dental care, offering services such as dental implants, sedation, professional oral hygiene, and pediatric dentistry. The company maintains a small regional presence with two physical locations and provides clear contact information and business registration details, enhancing credibility. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Fancybox, Swiper, and Select2, integrated with Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented with GDPR compliance in mind. However, some security headers are missing, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, indicating room for improvement in security governance. Overall, the security posture is solid for a small healthcare provider, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and business information support legitimacy. The site is not blocked by any WAF or security challenge, allowing full content access and analysis. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and adding terms of service to improve compliance and trust. The risk assessment is moderate-low, with the main risks related to missing WHOIS transparency and some security best practices. The business should focus on strengthening security policies and maintaining GDPR compliance to sustain trust and operational resilience.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention sypsenaok.lt, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for sypsenaok.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with sypsenaok.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sypsenaok.lt.