Skip to main content

Security report for synlab-notes.com

SYNLAB International · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SYNLAB International's investor website synlab-notes.com serves as a portal for investors and registered users to access company information and conference calls. The site is built on TYPO3 CMS and employs modern web technologies, providing a professional and consistent user experience. The business focus is on healthcare laboratory services with an international presence. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness and basic SEO features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and secure login forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. Privacy compliance is supported by clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching synlab-notes.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SYNLAB International positions itself as a leading healthcare laboratory service provider with a global footprint. The investor site targets shareholders and potential investors, offering access to conference calls and corporate information. The business model revolves around B2B and B2C laboratory testing services. The website links to the main corporate domain synlab.com, indicating a partnership or corporate relationship. The lack of detailed company registration and contact information on this site suggests it is a supplementary investor portal rather than a primary business site. Growth indicators and partnerships are implied but not explicitly detailed on this site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and secure login mechanisms including CSRF tokens. However, it lacks visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, and no incident response contact channels are published. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, indicating awareness of compliance obligations. The absence of explicit contact information and WHOIS data reduces transparency and may impact trust. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with enhanced headers, published policies, and contact details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies with contact channels.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance accessibility and SEO optimizations for broader compliance and reach.
  5. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SYNLAB International
Description
Investor website of SYNLAB, a healthcare company providing laboratory services internationally.
Key services
Laboratory testing, Investor relations, Conference calls
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, SVG, Bootstrap
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with CSRF token

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  3. Website uses TYPO3 CMS and modern frontend technologies.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. Login form uses CSRF tokens and secure POST method.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. External links limited to LinkedIn and main corporate site synlab.com.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging Bootstrap and modern JavaScript libraries for UI and animations. The site uses compressed CSS and JS assets for performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical errors or broken elements were detected. However, the site lacks advanced SEO metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing asset delivery and caching strategies. The absence of security headers is a technical risk that should be addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with synlab-notes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review synlab-notes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.