Skip to main content

Security report for sycamorepark.co.uk

Hospitality · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sycamore Park is a UK-based hospitality business specializing in providing an adult-only site for touring caravans and motor homes. Established in 2013, it caters to a niche market of adult caravan and motor home users seeking a dedicated and peaceful environment. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with a focus on user-friendly design and mobile responsiveness. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, which are essential for GDPR compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no evident security headers or incident response information, suggesting room for improvement in protecting user data and enhancing trust. Overall, the business appears legitimate with a consistent domain registration history, but the website would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sycamorepark.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
64
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on a specialized market segment of adult-only caravan and motor home touring. Its market position is niche, targeting mature customers who prefer an exclusive environment. The business model is service-oriented, providing site facilities and accommodation for caravans and motor homes. The domain age and registrar data support a stable and established presence. However, the lack of visible contact information and policies on the website may limit customer engagement and trust. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company could improve its competitive advantage by enhancing transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. The website uses HTTPS (implied by the domain and typical WordPress hosting), but no security headers were detected in the provided content. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or incident response contact information, which are critical for GDPR compliance and security incident management. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified, but the absence of security best practices such as CSP or X-Frame-Options headers is a concern. The site does not appear to use advanced security frameworks or certifications. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement to meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email for incident response.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining security certifications or compliance attestations to boost trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
An adult only site for touring caravans and motor homes, likely a campsite or park offering facilities for adult visitors with caravans and motor homes.
Key services
touring caravan site, motor home site, adult only accommodation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Fonts, Bootstrap 4, PHP
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  4. Site uses WordPress with Elementor and Google Fonts.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. Site targets adult caravan and motor home users, but no explicit adult content.
  7. WHOIS data shows a long-registered domain with GoDaddy registrar.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder, leveraging Google Fonts and Bootstrap 4 for styling and layout. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and a professional design quality. However, there is no evidence of advanced performance optimization or accessibility features beyond basic levels. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy but may limit marketing insights. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security headers and policies indicates gaps in security and compliance infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sycamorepark.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sycamorepark.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.