Skip to main content

Security report for swiss-belhotel.com

Swiss-Belhotel International · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Swiss-Belhotel International operates a global hospitality business offering hotel and resort accommodations primarily across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. The company targets both business and leisure travelers, providing direct booking options with exclusive rates and loyalty benefits. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and integrated marketing tools. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including service workers, multiple analytics platforms, and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and some security best practices observed, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not evident. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness but the professional site design and content mitigate concerns. Overall, the site presents a low risk profile with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching swiss-belhotel.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention swiss-belhotel.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,644
Employees
47
Customers
1,187
Third parties
1,410
Weak passwords
25%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for swiss-belhotel.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sbecfo.swiss-belhotel.com2026-06-13
  • –sbecfo.swiss-belhotel.com2026-06-13
  • –sbecfo.swiss-belhotel.com2026-06-13
  • –sbecfo.swiss-belhotel.com2026-06-12
  • –webmail.swiss-belhotel.com2026-05-25

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Swiss-Belhotel International positions itself as a large hospitality group with a broad geographic footprint. Its business model centers on direct online bookings, loyalty programs, and diversified hospitality services including dining. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers to optimize customer engagement. The website's clear navigation and multilingual capabilities support a global customer base. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data is unusual but may be due to privacy or registry policies. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and offers trust signals such as privacy policies and secure login portals. Growth indicators include active marketing integrations and a comprehensive hotel portfolio.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are used, which necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that should be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened with formal policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear incident response and security policy documentation to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts for vulnerabilities and minimize tracking where possible to enhance privacy.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Swiss-Belhotel International
Description
Book directly with Swiss-Belhotel International and enjoy exclusive rates, special perks, and the best available offers. Discover our global collection of hotels and resorts across Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and beyond—perfect for business or leisure stays.
Key services
Hotel bookings, Resort stays, Loyalty programs, Dining services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotelchamp, Bablic translation, Service Workers, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of service workers
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Hotelchamp, Bablic translation
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which is unusual for a commercial site.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools are integrated.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  7. Contact information is available but no direct emails or phone numbers extracted from HTML snippet.
  8. Site uses service workers and modern web technologies.
  9. No suspicious or malicious scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with asynchronous JavaScript loading, service workers for PWA capabilities, and integration with multiple analytics and marketing platforms such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Hotelchamp. The site is multilingual with language selection and uses CDN-hosted assets for performance. CSS and JavaScript are managed with load optimizations. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears to be a custom or proprietary system. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. There is some technical debt in missing explicit security headers and limited accessibility features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with swiss-belhotel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review swiss-belhotel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.