Skip to main content

Security report for sweet.tv

SWEET.TV · Media · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SWEET.TV is a well-established OTT media streaming service founded in 2010, offering a wide range of TV channels, movies, and animation content under a subscription model. The platform targets a broad general audience across multiple countries, providing high-quality streaming with features like time-shifted broadcasts and recorded shows. The website demonstrates a professional design with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, supported by modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, AngularJS, and Cloudflare services. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are robust and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature approach to user data protection. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and error monitoring, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, SWEET.TV presents a trustworthy and credible online presence with extensive analytics and advertising integrations, suitable for its media streaming business model.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sweet.tv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mail.sweet.tv

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sweet.tv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector as a subscription-based OTT streaming platform with over 16 million users, positioning itself as a national leader offering premium TV channels and top movies from major studios. Its business model relies on recurring revenue from subscription plans and advertising opportunities. The platform supports multiple languages and countries, indicating a broad market reach. Partnerships with corporate entities under SWEET.TV Group and use of advanced marketing and tracking tools suggest a sophisticated ecosystem. The absence of direct phone contacts but presence of corporate email and contact forms aligns with digital-first customer engagement. The company’s longevity and domain age support its market credibility.

Security posture

SWEET.TV maintains a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security headers, though DNSSEC is not enabled which could be improved. The site employs consent management via Didomi, ensuring GDPR compliance. Use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager is managed with user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. The platform uses error monitoring tools like Bugsnag, indicating proactive operational security. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and implementing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Domains By Proxy, LLC (registrant privacy)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SWEET.TV
Description
SWEET.TV is a national online movie theater offering TV channels and movies online in high quality with subscription plans.
Key services
TV channels streaming, Movies streaming, Animation content, Subscription plans, Advertising opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap, AngularJS (implied by Angular mention), Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Didomi Consent Management, Bugsnag (error monitoring), Lozad.js (lazy loading)
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web, Smart TV apps (implied)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of error monitoring (Bugsnag)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Admixer
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Didomi Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers OTT streaming services with subscription plans.
  2. Strong presence of user testimonials and trust signals.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy management.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Domain privacy protection is standard for this industry.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  8. No visible phone contact numbers; only email contact provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap, AngularJS, and Cloudflare DNS/CDN services. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, managed through a consent framework (Didomi). Performance is moderate with lazy loading techniques (Lozad.js) employed. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting via Cloudflare provides resilience and security benefits. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve DNS security and accessibility compliance. Overall, the infrastructure supports a scalable and user-friendly OTT streaming platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sweet.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sweet.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.