Skip to main content

Security report for svoboda-williams.com

Svoboda & Williams · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Svoboda & Williams is a well-established real estate agency operating primarily in Prague and Brno, Czech Republic, with a business history dating back to 2006. The company offers a range of services including property sales, rentals, property management, and shared office spaces. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting individuals and businesses interested in real estate within the Czech Republic and select international markets. The site integrates modern web technologies such as Alpine.js and Laravel Livewire, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience with advanced search and filtering capabilities. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, although some enhancements like DNSSEC and additional security headers could improve their posture. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching svoboda-williams.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
65
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention svoboda-williams.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
20
Employees
0
Customers
20
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for svoboda-williams.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a regional leader in real estate services with a medium-sized operation. Their business model focuses on comprehensive real estate solutions including sales, rentals, and property management, catering to both residential and commercial clients. The presence of market reports and a magazine partnership indicates an effort to establish thought leadership and market insight. Social media integration and multilingual support (Czech and English) enhance their outreach and customer engagement. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a preference for contact via forms or social media channels. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, reflecting a baseline security posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security.txt, and explicit security policies indicates gaps in their security governance and incident response readiness. The lack of comprehensive security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms may expose the company to certain risks and reduce transparency for security researchers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Enhancing DNS security and publishing clear security policies would strengthen their security maturity and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common web attacks.
  5. Provide clear and direct company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve customer support and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Svoboda & Williams
Description
Svoboda & Williams – realitní kancelář Praha, Brno. Byty, rodinné domy, komerční nemovitosti, sdílené kanceláře. Prodej, pronájem, správa nemovitostí.
Key services
Property sales, Property rentals, Property management, Shared office spaces, Real estate market reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, Livewire (Laravel), Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, SimpleBar, Cookie Consent library
Frameworks
Laravel Livewire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and functional.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or navigation.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating some privacy compliance.
  4. Multiple social media profiles linked, enhancing trust.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  6. Search and filter forms are extensive and well implemented using modern frameworks.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  9. Google reCAPTCHA is used for bot protection on forms.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Alpine.js and Laravel Livewire, enabling dynamic and reactive user interfaces. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes, alongside a cookie consent library to manage privacy compliance. Hosting is provided by Active24, as indicated by the domain's nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site includes advanced search filters with multi-language support, indicating a mature and user-centric design. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility further, as well as to enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with svoboda-williams.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review svoboda-williams.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.