Skip to main content

Security report for sviridenko.law

Sviridenko & Partners · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sviridenko & Partners is a small legal services firm specializing in fintech law, corporate law, compliance, AML, MiCA regulation, and immigration services. The firm targets both B2B clients and private individuals, positioning itself as a trusted legal partner in the fintech and regulatory compliance niche. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and a focus on regulatory expertise. Technically, the website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer locks in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed through Cookiebot consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. However, no explicit terms of service or incident response policies are published. Overall, the website is trustworthy, safe, and professionally maintained, suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sviridenko.law

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance and legal sectors, focusing on emerging regulatory areas such as fintech and blockchain law, including MiCA regulation. Its business model is service-oriented, providing legal consultancy and compliance solutions to businesses and individuals. The firm is relatively new, founded in 2022, and based in Latvia, which aligns with the domain registration data. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on quality and compliance, with marketing efforts supported by Google Ads and analytics tools. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site may indicate a preference for controlled client engagement via contact forms. The firm does not display certifications or security accreditations publicly, which is typical for small legal practices. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed on the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and domain registration locks that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be a potential area for DNS spoofing risk mitigation. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security are not detected, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Cookiebot, which are industry standard but require ongoing monitoring for updates. Incident response and security policies are not published, which could be improved to demonstrate security maturity. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small legal services website but could be enhanced with additional controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal disclaimers.
  5. Consider providing direct contact information such as verified company emails and phone numbers to improve client accessibility and credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sviridenko & Partners
Description
Sviridenko & Partners provides a wide range of legal services both in the B2B sector and for private individuals. Their main expertise lies in Fintech Law, Crypto MiCa regulation, Corporate Law, immigration and AML.
Key services
Fintech Law, Crypto MiCa regulation, Corporate Law, Immigration, AML and Compliance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Tilda CMS
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-17057648001)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content; contact is via form
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with appropriate consent
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.10.2 and various Tilda-specific scripts for animations, menus, and forms. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and hosts assets on Tilda's CDN and GoDaddy's domain control nameservers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and prefetching of DNS for key domains. Mobile optimization is good with responsive menus and layouts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph tags, and canonical links. The site does not expose any sensitive data or use outdated vulnerable libraries. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy with domain registration consistent with the business location.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sviridenko.law. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sviridenko.law.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.