Skip to main content

Security report for sv-restaurant.ch

SV Restaurant · Hospitality · Switzerland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SV Restaurant is a hospitality business operating a restaurant chain in Switzerland, offering menu plans and multiple store locations. The website is built using modern Angular framework and includes cookie consent mechanisms with default denial of ad and analytics storage, reflecting a basic level of privacy compliance. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and contact information, which are important for user trust and regulatory compliance. The technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, adding contact details, and enhancing security headers to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sv-restaurant.ch

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a regional restaurant chain targeting general consumers seeking dining services. Its business model focuses on hospitality services with multiple physical locations and menu offerings. The website supports this with navigation to menu plans and store locations but lacks detailed business or legal information. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some marketing and analytics efforts, though tracking is minimal due to default consent denial. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may limit customer engagement and trust. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent to manage tracking permissions, which are positive security practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder effective security incident management. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Enhancing security headers and publishing security policies would strengthen the security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SV Restaurant
Description
SV Restaurant is a hospitality business providing restaurant services with multiple locations and menu plans. The website offers information about menus, locations, and general information about the restaurant.
Key services
Restaurant dining, Menu planning, Multiple store locations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 19.2.9, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with default denial of ad and analytics storage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Angular framework version 19.2.9
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with default denial of ad and analytics storage
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. Website is well-branded and consistent with a hospitality business
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 19.2.9, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and cookie-script.com for cookie consent management. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and stylesheets, suggesting modular code splitting. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could be improved with optimization. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and landmarks but could be enhanced. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph metadata. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sv-restaurant.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sv-restaurant.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.