Skip to main content

Security report for sutka.eu

TRADE CENTRE PRAHA, a.s. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aquacentrum Šutka is a well-established aquatic and wellness center located in Prague, operated by TRADE CENTRE PRAHA, a.s. The facility offers a variety of swimming pools, wellness services including saunas and steam baths, and family-friendly recreational activities. The website is professionally designed, providing clear navigation, multilingual support, and integrated social media channels. It targets local families and wellness enthusiasts, positioning itself as a key leisure destination in Prague. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is addressed with a GDPR-compliant privacy policy and cookie banner. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though there is room for improvement in security posture and transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sutka.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sutka.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on aquatic leisure and wellness services. It benefits from partnerships with local government and tourism entities, enhancing its market reach. The business model relies on direct consumer services including pool access, wellness treatments, courses, and paid parking. The presence of a newsletter and active social media engagement indicates ongoing customer relationship management. The company appears medium-sized with a stable market position in Prague. The website content and structure support a professional image, aiding customer trust and retention. No suspicious or fraudulent indicators were found, and the domain is consistent with the business identity despite lack of WHOIS transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting. The use of somewhat outdated jQuery version may pose risks if not regularly patched. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site is secure enough for its business type but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TRADE CENTRE PRAHA, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TRADE CENTRE PRAHA, a.s.
Description
Aquacentrum Šutka is a swimming and wellness center in Prague offering a 50m indoor pool, whirlpool, wild river, toboggans, relaxation and children's pools, and wellness facilities including saunas and steam baths. The facility is fully accessible and targets families and wellness enthusiasts.
Key services
Aquapark, Swimming pools, Wellness and saunas, Swimming courses, Paid parking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Bootstrap (implied by classes), Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech with English language option available.
  3. Clear cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. Multiple social media integrations (Facebook, Instagram).
  5. Contact information is complete and prominently displayed.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. Newsletter subscription requires explicit consent.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK for analytics and social integration. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with a clear navigation structure. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The site lacks advanced technical SEO features such as structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph tags beyond basic meta tags. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS with some Bootstrap classes implied. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or progressive web app features. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sutka.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sutka.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.