Skip to main content

Security report for susicko.cz

Destinace Sušicko, z. s. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Destinace Sušicko, z. s. operates an official tourism and information portal for the Sušice region and the Šumava area in the Czech Republic. The website provides comprehensive event calendars, travel tips, accommodation and gastronomy information, and serves as a key resource for tourists and visitors. The organization is a registered non-profit entity, reinforcing its role as a regional tourism promoter. The site targets tourists seeking cultural, sporting, and nature experiences in the region. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Google Maps API. It is mobile optimized and provides multi-language support via the ConveyThis translation widget. Performance is moderate with good SEO and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is supported by accessible privacy and cookie policies, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for the regional tourism organization, though improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended to enhance security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching susicko.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a key regional tourism promoter for Sušice and the Šumava region, operating as a non-profit entity. Its business model focuses on providing information and marketing the region's attractions to tourists, leveraging partnerships with official Czech tourism bodies and local municipalities. The website's content and structure support visitor engagement through event calendars, travel tips, and local services. The presence of social media channels and newsletter subscription indicates active audience engagement. The lack of direct commercial services suggests revenue streams may come from public funding or partnerships. The partnership ecosystem includes VisitCzechia and local tourism initiatives, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency. Third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Hotjar are used, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were found in the analysis. GDPR compliance is indicated by privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial informational site but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Destinace Sušicko, z. s.
Registration number
09776559
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Destinace Sušicko, z. s.
Description
Oficiální turistický a informační portál města Sušice. Přehled akcí na Sušicku, tipy na výlety a zážitky, informační centrum.
Key services
Tourist information, Event calendar, Travel tips, Accommodation and gastronomy information, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Hotjar, ConveyThis translation widget
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form with required email input
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
ConveyThis translation widget, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official tourism portal for Sušice and the Šumava region.
  2. Content is well structured with event calendars, travel tips, and local information.
  3. Multiple language options available via ConveyThis widget.
  4. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram confirmed.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policy pages are present and accessible.
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  10. Website uses modern technologies and is mobile optimized.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern front-end libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking, and uses Google Maps API for location services. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and multi-language support via ConveyThis. Hosting appears to be Webflow's managed platform, providing reliable uptime and SSL. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization opportunities in script loading and caching. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from modernization in accessibility and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with susicko.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review susicko.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.