Skip to main content

Security report for surschiste.com

SURSCHISTE · Energy · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SURSCHISTE is a French industrial and commercial operator specializing in the valorization and transformation of by-products from thermal power plants. As a subsidiary of EP Power Minerals (EPPM), it holds a stable market position within the energy sector, focusing on sustainable industrial processes. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear descriptions of its core services and target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates SEO best practices via Yoast SEO. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, and a cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some privacy awareness. However, the absence of a visible privacy policy and terms of service reduces privacy compliance confidence. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain status locks, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy and security disclosures to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching surschiste.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, specifically focusing on by-product valorization from thermal power plants, which positions it in a niche industrial market. Its business model revolves around commercial and industrial operations, likely generating revenue through partnerships with power plants and industrial clients. The website's content and metadata suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a mature domain age consistent with its founding in 1998. The lack of explicit contact information and certifications on the site limits direct customer engagement insights. The use of WordPress and Divi theme indicates a standard digital presence, suitable for corporate communications. The absence of visible partner or subsidiary domains suggests a focused operational scope. The company could enhance its market positioning by publishing more detailed business and compliance information online.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain status protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options represent gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site does not disclose incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are important for security transparency and readiness. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is weakened by the missing privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Add an incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Review and minimize user tracking to align with privacy best practices and improve GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SURSCHISTE
Description
SURSCHISTE est un opérateur commercial et industriel chargé de valoriser et de transformer les coproduits des centrales thermiques
Key services
valorization of by-products from thermal power plants, transformation of thermal power plant co-products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO plugin, Divi Theme, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or metadata.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present via a plugin.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  8. Website content is professional and focused on energy sector by-product valorization.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a widely used CMS and theme combination that supports flexible content management and SEO optimization. The presence of Yoast SEO plugin indicates attention to search engine optimization. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic, with no advanced ARIA or accessibility features identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy disclosures to reduce technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with surschiste.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review surschiste.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.