Skip to main content

Security report for surgalclinic.cz

SurGal Clinic s.r.o. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SurGal Clinic s.r.o. is a private healthcare provider based in Brno, Czech Republic, specializing in surgery, orthopedics, gastroenterology, plastic surgery, rehabilitation, and intensive care among other medical services. The clinic targets both local and foreign patients, offering standard healthcare services covered by health insurance as well as premium paid services under the GRAND CLASS brand. The website reflects a professional healthcare institution with comprehensive patient information, contact details, and certifications, positioning it as a reputable medium-sized healthcare provider in the region. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and AOS, and uses the Foundation framework for responsive design. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking, with a clear cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating good privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is implied, explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common and justified for this business type. Overall, the website is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching surgalclinic.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SurGal Clinic operates in the healthcare sector, providing specialized medical services with a focus on surgery and orthopedics. Its business model combines insurance-covered healthcare with optional premium services, targeting both domestic and international patients. The clinic maintains partnerships with academic institutions such as Masaryk University, enhancing its credibility and expertise. The presence of certifications and awards supports its market positioning as a quality provider. The website's content and structure indicate a mature digital presence, supporting patient engagement and service promotion. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct patient communication rather than broad social marketing. The clinic's ecosystem includes a premium subdomain for foreign clients, indicating segmentation and tailored service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and has implemented a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces its security robustness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The feedback form uses POST method and includes basic anti-spam hidden fields, but no advanced security controls are evident. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a healthcare website but could benefit from enhanced HTTP security headers and documented security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies with contact information for reporting vulnerabilities.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience.
  5. Consider adding social media presence or verified trust seals to increase user trust and engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SurGal Clinic s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SurGal Clinic s.r.o.
Description
Soukromé zdravotnické zařízení v Brně poskytující chirurgii, ortopedii, zobrazovací metody, rehabilitaci a další specializované zdravotní služby.
Key services
Chirurgie, Ortopedie, Gastroenterologie, Plastická chirurgie, Rehabilitace, Intenzivní péče, Následná péče, Dlouhodobá péče, Zobrazovací metody, Interní medicína
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Foundation Framework, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  4. Strong presence of healthcare certifications and awards
  5. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  6. Contact information is clear and complete
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site
  10. No social media links detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of jQuery and modern UI libraries such as Slick Carousel and AOS for animations, supported by the Foundation framework for responsive design. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary solution. The technical stack is stable but could be modernized with newer frameworks and enhanced security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with surgalclinic.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review surgalclinic.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.