Skip to main content

Security report for supremacy1914.com

Bytro Labs · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Supremacy 1914 is an online real-time strategy browser game developed and operated by Bytro Labs. The game focuses on World War I themed multiplayer strategy gameplay, targeting gamers interested in historical and strategic online experiences. The website supports multiple languages and offers user account registration with social login options including Facebook, Google, and Apple. The business model appears to be free-to-play with account-based access. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js and Scriptaculous, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, Facebook SDK for social features, and uses Didomi for GDPR-compliant consent management. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA for bot prevention, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. The website demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and privacy compliance, but the absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its gaming audience but could improve transparency in security and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supremacy1914.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bytro Labs positions Supremacy 1914 as a niche multiplayer strategy game with a historical theme, leveraging browser accessibility to reach a broad international audience. The company uses social login integrations to streamline user onboarding and employs consent management tools to comply with privacy regulations. The lack of visible direct contact information and security policies suggests a focus on user experience over corporate transparency on the website. The game likely generates revenue through in-game purchases or premium features, common in free-to-play models. The presence of multiple language options indicates a global market approach. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and uses trusted third-party services for analytics and user engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, indicating a baseline security posture. Consent management via Didomi reflects GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of HTTP security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts are gaps that could be addressed to enhance security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a gaming website but could benefit from improved transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bytro Labs
Description
The World War I real-time strategy browsergame
Key services
Online multiplayer strategy game, User account management, Social login integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Prototype.js, Scriptaculous, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, Didomi Consent SDK, Helpshift
Platforms
Browser
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot prevention
  • Consent management via Didomi
  • Social login integrations with OAuth providers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Didomi Consent SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a real-time strategy browser game themed on World War I
  2. Supports multiple languages with language selector
  3. Offers user registration and login including social logins (Facebook, Google, Apple)
  4. Includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policy
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on landing page
  6. No explicit security or incident response contact information found
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  8. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and consent management tools
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
  10. WHOIS data missing, which is a risk factor
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of legacy and modern JavaScript libraries including Prototype.js and Scriptaculous, which may indicate some technical debt but also stable functionality. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK supports analytics and social features. The presence of Didomi SDK ensures GDPR-compliant consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and supports multiple languages. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds and multiple external scripts potentially impacting load times. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be modernized for improved performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supremacy1914.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supremacy1914.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.