Skip to main content

Security report for superpower-staging.com

Superpower Health, Inc. · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Superpower Health, Inc. operates a digital health platform focused on advanced biomarker testing and personalized longevity care. The company offers a subscription-based membership that includes annual comprehensive blood testing covering over 100 biomarkers, combined with concierge medical support and personalized health plans. Positioned as an innovative player in the preventive healthcare and longevity market, Superpower leverages partnerships with top medical professionals and prestigious institutions to enhance credibility and service quality. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with extensive use of modern analytics, marketing, and tracking technologies, hosted on AWS and built with Webflow CMS. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though some compliance gaps exist such as the lack of explicit cookie consent mechanisms and published security policies. Overall, the platform presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online presence suitable for its target health-conscious audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching superpower-staging.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Superpower targets health-conscious consumers seeking early detection and personalized health insights through biomarker testing. Its business model centers on annual subscription memberships billed at $199, providing access to lab testing, health tracking, and clinical support. The company benefits from strong branding, endorsements from medical experts, and affiliations with leading universities. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and add-on diagnostic services. The marketing ecosystem is robust, utilizing multiple ad networks, affiliate programs, and advanced analytics tools to optimize customer acquisition and retention. The staging domain and recent registration date align with a growing startup in the healthcare technology sector. Strategic partnerships and a clear value proposition position Superpower competitively in the digital health market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers to protect users. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and published security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement in privacy compliance and transparency. The WHOIS data shows no privacy protection, supporting domain legitimacy. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts requires ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving GDPR cookie compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a clear cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Superpower Health, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Superpower Health, Inc.
Description
A new era of personal health. The world's most advanced digital clinic to help you live longer, prevent disease, and feel your best.
Key services
Annual biomarker lab testing (100+ biomarkers), Personalized health plans, Concierge medical support, Add-on diagnostic testing, Access to longevity-focused clinical care
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, Mixpanel, PostHog, Klaviyo, GSAP, Finsweet Attributes, Swiper.js, Lottie Player
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
AWS (Amazon Registrar, AWS DNS), Stripe (payment processing via coupon API)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No DNSSEC (recommended to enable)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies with SameSite=Lax
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Secure form handling with analytics tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment, Mixpanel, PostHog, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads, Twitter Ads, Bing Ads, Beehiiv Ad Network
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), Mixpanel, PostHog, Segment Analytics, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Intellimize, Klaviyo, Segment, Mixpanel, PostHog
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a staging environment but fully functional and content-rich.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  3. Comprehensive health service offering with clear business model.
  4. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on AWS infrastructure, ensuring scalability and reliability. It integrates a modern tech stack including GSAP for animations, Swiper.js for sliders, Lottie for vector animations, and multiple analytics platforms such as Segment, Mixpanel, PostHog, and Klaviyo for marketing automation and user behavior tracking. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. Structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for SEO and rich results. The presence of multiple external scripts and tracking pixels indicates a sophisticated marketing and analytics setup, though it necessitates careful management to avoid performance or privacy issues. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, performant, and aligned with best practices for digital health platforms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with superpower-staging.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review superpower-staging.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.