Skip to main content

Security report for supercritical.com

Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website domaincontactservice.com hosts a landing page for the domain supercritical.com, which is currently offered for sale. The business model centers on premium domain name brokerage, targeting buyers interested in high-value domains, particularly in the energy or nuclear physics sector. The site provides a contact form with Google reCAPTCHA for inquiries and uses multiple Google Analytics tracking IDs for visitor analysis. The domain supercritical.com is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC since 2017, with protective domain statuses indicating legitimate ownership and management. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.3.1, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good design and user experience. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers are detected, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating a gap in compliance with data protection regulations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and reCAPTCHA to protect form submissions, but lacks published security policies and incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, with no suspicious patterns. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and providing incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supercritical.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention supercritical.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for supercritical.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain sales business operates in a niche market of premium domain brokerage, focusing on high-value domains relevant to specialized industries such as nuclear physics and energy. The company leverages a simple but effective business model of listing domains for sale with an inquiry form. The market positioning is that of a premium domain marketplace, appealing to businesses seeking instant credibility and brand recognition through domain ownership. Revenue streams likely come from domain sales commissions or direct sales. The target customer segment includes businesses and investors in the energy sector or related fields. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no explicit partners or subsidiaries identified. Growth indicators are limited due to the single domain focus, but the use of professional tools and tracking suggests a data-driven approach to sales.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure communications and prevent spam. Protective domain statuses (clientDeleteProhibited, etc.) enhance domain security. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in security best practices. There is no visible incident response readiness or abuse contact information, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, impacting GDPR and other data protection regulations. The security culture appears basic, focused on minimal protection rather than comprehensive security management.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add incident response and abuse contact information to facilitate security issue reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The supercritical.com domain name is for sale. When it's extremely critical to secure the right domain for your nuclear physics business, look no further than supercritical.com.
Key services
Domain name sales, Domain brokerage, Offer submission via contact form
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.3.1, Google Fonts (Oswald, Roboto, Source Sans Pro), Font Awesome 5.6.3, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics (multiple UA and GA4 IDs), Efty domain sales platform scripts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Efty domain sales platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent spam
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (UA and GA4), Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain sales landing page for supercritical.com
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact only via a form with Google reCAPTCHA
  4. Uses multiple Google Analytics tracking IDs
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  6. DNSSEC not enabled
  7. Domain registration is valid and consistent with business purpose
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Website is mobile optimized and uses modern frontend technologies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used extensively for visitor tracking and marketing insights. The site is hosted likely on GoDaddy infrastructure, inferred from registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and potential risk. The site could benefit from modernization by adopting stronger security configurations and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supercritical.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supercritical.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.