Skip to main content

Security report for supercamp.lv

SUPER CAMP · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SUPER CAMP is an international summer camp for children and teenagers located in Latvia, offering thematic camp sessions with accommodation, meals, and a rich entertainment program. The camp targets children aged 7 to 17 and provides a variety of activities including sports, creative workshops, and special events such as foam parties and cosplay festivals. The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and integrates common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. Contact information is clearly provided, and the camp maintains an active presence on social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. However, the website lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its privacy compliance score. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to verify domain registration details. Overall, the site is professionally designed, secure with HTTPS, and provides comprehensive information about the camp offerings.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supercamp.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The camp positions itself as a premium international summer camp in Latvia with a focus on quality and unique entertainment options. It leverages partnerships with event agencies and cosplay organizations to enhance its program. The business model centers on providing all-inclusive camp experiences with accommodation, meals, and activities, targeting families seeking quality summer programs for children. The presence of discounts for early payment and detailed booking procedures indicate a structured sales process. The camp's social media channels and video content support marketing efforts and community engagement. The lack of visible certifications or formal security policies suggests room for improvement in trust-building measures.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security-related scripts such as Google reCAPTCHA, which helps protect forms from spam. However, it lacks several important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses outdated WordPress version 4.9.9, which may pose security risks if not patched. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from updates and enhanced security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  3. Update WordPress core and all plugins/themes to the latest versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing business registration details and certifications to improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SUPER CAMP
Description
Международный летний лагерь для детей и подростков в Латвии, предлагающий тематические смены с проживанием, питанием и развлекательной программой.
Key services
Летний лагерь с тематическими сменами, Проживание в отеле и банкетном здании, Развлекательные программы (пенна вечеринка, шоу, спорт, творчество), Трансфер из Риги и обратно, Проведение дней рождения и экскурсий
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.9, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO plugin, Easy Google AdSense plugin
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script (Google)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some Latvian language links.
  3. Site uses WordPress CMS with Avada theme and several common plugins.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected explicitly.
  5. Contact information including phone and email is clearly presented.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube is active.
  7. Advertising and tracking scripts are present, including Google AdSense and Facebook Pixel.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information found.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences, focused on children's summer camp.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress 4.9.9 CMS platform using the Avada theme, with jQuery 1.12.4 and various Google and Facebook marketing scripts. The site loads multiple external resources including YouTube embeds and Google AdSense ads. The performance is moderate with some optimization potential. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization via Yoast SEO plugin. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses multiple social media integrations and tracking pixels, indicating a mature digital marketing approach but with moderate privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supercamp.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supercamp.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.