Skip to main content

Security report for sunforwatt.com

Sunforwatt · Energy · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sunforwatt is a French photovoltaic energy solutions provider specializing in serving agricultural, industrial, and tertiary sectors. Established since 2008, the company offers comprehensive services from technical and financial studies to installation, compliance, commissioning, and ongoing maintenance of photovoltaic systems. Their market position is that of an experienced niche player with a growing footprint in renewable energy projects for businesses. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern front-end technologies and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers were detected, and the contact form relies on a third-party service without visible advanced protections. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts overall trust. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content but requires improvements in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sunforwatt.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sunforwatt operates in the renewable energy sector focusing on photovoltaic solutions for professional clients. Their business model revolves around project-based services including financing, installation, and maintenance. The company targets agricultural, industrial, and tertiary sectors, leveraging a strong technical expertise and a comprehensive service offering. Their competitive advantage lies in their end-to-end project management and long-standing market presence since 2008. The website reflects a small-sized company with consistent branding and a clear value proposition. Partnerships with entities like EDF OA, Consuel, and Enedis indicate integration with key industry players. Growth indicators include a portfolio of over 655 installations and 30 MW of installed capacity. The company maintains a LinkedIn presence but limited broader digital footprint. Strategic observations suggest focusing on strengthening domain legitimacy and enhancing privacy and security policies to build further trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data. The contact form uses a third-party service (formsubmit.co) without visible CAPTCHA or anti-spam measures, which could expose the site to spam or abuse. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. GDPR compliance is partial; a privacy policy is present but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern for legitimacy and trust. Recommendations include implementing security headers, enhancing form security, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website.
  4. Review and secure contact form handling, possibly moving from third-party service to own backend or adding CAPTCHA.
  5. Investigate and resolve domain WHOIS registration inconsistencies to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sunforwatt
Description
Sunforwatt aide les secteurs agricole, industriel et tertiaire à réaliser leurs projets photovoltaïques. Optimisez votre financement pour constructions neuves ou rénovations de toitures et atteignez l'autonomie énergétique. De l'étude technique à la maintenance, nous gérons tout.
Key services
Technical and financial study, Administrative management, Installation, Control and compliance, Commissioning, Maintenance and supervision
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical link
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form uses third-party service (formsubmit.co) for submissions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French language.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite GDPR-relevant content.
  5. Contact form uses third-party service (formsubmit.co) without visible CAPTCHA or advanced anti-spam.
  6. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Good business and technical presentation with clear service offerings.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies including jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site includes well-structured meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. The use of third-party services for form submission and analytics is standard but requires monitoring for security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sunforwatt.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sunforwatt.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.