Summit Athletic Media is a specialized creative agency focused on sports marketing and design, serving athletic teams and organizations with a comprehensive suite of services including branding, print, video, and digital marketing. Established in 1997, the company has a strong market position supported by notable clients and a professional online presence. The website reflects a well-structured, visually appealing platform with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and published security policies indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance is lacking due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet regulatory standards. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with clear contact information and strong branding consistency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention summitathletics.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for summitathletics.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates in the media sector, specifically targeting sports marketing and design for collegiate and professional athletic organizations. Their business model revolves around providing creative and strategic marketing services, including print and digital media production. The presence of case studies with high-profile clients like ESPN and Utah State indicates a competitive advantage and established reputation. The company targets sports organizations seeking specialized marketing solutions, with growth potential in digital and social media marketing. Partnerships appear limited to industry-related job boards and social media platforms. The business is small-sized, US-based, and has maintained domain registration consistency since 2004, supporting credibility.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, indicating limited transparency in security practices. The use of third-party analytics and tag management scripts introduces moderate tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other regulations. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented, which could impact trust in case of security incidents.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible security reporting.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Summit Athletic Media
Description
Summit Athletic Media is an award-winning, full-service creative agency specializing in sports marketing and design. Founded in 1997, they offer a wide range of creative and strategic services specifically for athletic teams and organizations.
Key services
Sports marketing, Design, Branding, Print materials, Video production, Social media management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lozad.js (lazy loading), HTML5 video, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
No visible vulnerable libraries
Secure video and script loading
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a professional sports marketing and design agency site.
No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
No security policy or incident response information is published.
Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Good branding consistency and professional presentation.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. Lazy loading is implemented via lozad.js to optimize performance. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Amazon Registrar, indicating likely AWS infrastructure. Performance is moderate with responsive video content adapting to screen size. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with additional ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by adding security headers and improving privacy compliance.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with summitathletics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review summitathletics.com.