Skip to main content

Security report for summertime.lv

Sumertime restaurant · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Summertime restaurant is a hospitality business based in Jūrmala, Latvia, specializing in event organization including weddings, banquets, corporate events, and birthday parties for all ages. The website presents a professional and visually appealing interface with clear navigation and multilingual support (Latvian and Russian). The business targets local customers seeking event hosting services by the sea. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and secure forms, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or terms of service pages. Cookie consent is implemented via a third-party service, indicating some GDPR awareness. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly impacts trust but is common for small businesses. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and suitable for its business purpose, though improvements in security and compliance documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching summertime.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on event management and catering services. Its market position is local and niche, serving customers in the Jūrmala region. The business model revolves around providing venue and catering services for private and corporate events. Revenue streams likely include event bookings and catering sales. The website supports customer engagement through contact forms and phone reservations. The presence on social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. The lack of detailed business registration data online suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise. The partnership with 5REASONS for website development indicates collaboration with local digital agencies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and forms include validation, reducing risk of data interception and injection attacks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No visible incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. The site uses up-to-date WordPress and plugins, but continuous monitoring and patching are essential. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality website but could be improved to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish terms of service and security policy pages to increase transparency and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update all software components including WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sumertime restaurant
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sumertime restaurant
Description
Restorāns "Summertime" offers banquet, wedding, event and corporate organization, birthday parties for children, teenagers and adults, and off-site banquets.
Key services
Wedding organization, Banquet organization, Off-site banquets, Children's birthday parties, Adult and teenager birthday parties, Corporate event organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.1.0, WooCommerce 3.3.6, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, Contact Form 7, Bootstrap Datepicker, Jarallax, Swiper, Fancybox
Frameworks
WordPress 6.7.2
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking and analytics tools.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical addresses.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via third-party service.
  7. Website content is in Latvian and Russian languages.
  8. Business is a small hospitality/event organization in Latvia.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with WooCommerce 3.3.6, leveraging jQuery 3.1.0 and several JavaScript libraries for UI effects and analytics. It uses Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Yandex Metrika for traffic and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and includes accessibility features at a basic level. Performance is moderate, with some caching and optimization via Autoptimize plugin. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses a third-party cookie consent service. Technical debt is low but could be reduced by updating to newer versions of libraries and improving security headers. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with summertime.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review summertime.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.