Skip to main content

Security report for suiteexperiencegroup.com

Suite Experience Group · Hospitality · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Suite Experience Group operates a leading luxury suite rental marketplace specializing in premium suite access for sporting events and concerts across the United States and Canada. The company targets affluent individuals and corporate clients seeking exclusive event experiences without long-term commitments. Their market position is strong, supported by multiple trust indicators including a 6-time Inc 5000 honoree status and ALSD certification. The website presents a professional, well-branded, and content-rich platform that effectively communicates their services and client base. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, FontAwesome, jQuery, Algolia Search, and Leaflet.js for mapping. Google Analytics (GA4) is used for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices, though accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for compliance and security hardening. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, reducing trust in domain legitimacy despite the professional web presence. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and verification of domain registration details to improve legitimacy and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching suiteexperiencegroup.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Suite Experience Group's business model centers on a resale marketplace for luxury suites, enabling suite holders to rent out unused suites and consumers to access premium event experiences. Their competitive advantage lies in nationwide coverage, a broad portfolio of teams and venues, and a seamless booking process. The company serves both corporate clients and affluent individuals, leveraging partnerships with venue owners and suite holders. Revenue streams likely include commissions on suite rentals and service fees. The presence of major corporate clients and press coverage indicates strong market penetration and brand recognition. Strategic partnerships with related platforms like suitepro.com enhance service offerings. Growth indicators include repeated Inc 5000 recognition and expanding suite inventory. The company operates primarily in the hospitality sector within the US market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of a cookie consent banner and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms may pose regulatory risks under GDPR and similar frameworks. No published security policy or incident response contacts limit transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues that affect trust. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, improving user trust and legal compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration details to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet standards and broaden audience reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Suite Experience Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Suite Experience Group
Description
The leading source for luxury suites at sporting events and concerts nationwide
Key services
Luxury suite rentals, Suite booking coordination, Suite resale marketplace
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.2, FontAwesome 5.15.4, jQuery 3.7.1, Algolia Search, Leaflet.js, Google Analytics (GA4)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (GA4)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Algolia Search
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  4. Strong business presence with multiple trust signals and certifications.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Algolia for search functionality, and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. Google Analytics (GA4) is integrated for visitor tracking. The site uses well-structured meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. Performance is moderate, with some scripts preloaded to optimize loading times. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive layouts and viewport settings. However, accessibility could be improved by adding ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional user experience but has room for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with suiteexperiencegroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review suiteexperiencegroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.