Skip to main content

Security report for suedtiroljazzfestival.com

JMP - Jazz Music Promotion · Media · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Südtirol Jazzfestival Alto Adige is a well-established cultural event organized by JMP - Jazz Music Promotion, focusing on international jazz performances in the South Tyrol region of Italy. The festival has a strong regional presence with international recognition, targeting jazz enthusiasts and cultural tourists. The website supports multiple languages and provides comprehensive information about the festival, tickets, news, and media galleries. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Foundation framework, and lightbox plugins, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious Google Analytics implementation, though improvements in DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching suedtiroljazzfestival.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention suedtiroljazzfestival.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for suedtiroljazzfestival.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates in the media and cultural event sector, leveraging partnerships with regional government bodies and sponsors to maintain its market position. Its business model centers on event organization, ticket sales, and artist promotion. The presence of a newsletter and active social media channels supports audience engagement and marketing efforts. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm a long-standing operation, reinforcing credibility. The partnership ecosystem includes local municipalities and cultural institutions, which strengthens its regional influence and funding opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization aligns with privacy best practices. Overall, the security posture is sufficient for the business type but could benefit from additional hardening measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JMP - Jazz Music Promotion
VAT number
IT02435840216
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JMP - Jazz Music Promotion
Description
Das Südtirol Jazzfestival Alto Adige ist ein internationales Jazzfestival mit weltbekannten Künstlern, das jährlich in Südtirol stattfindet und verschiedene Musikstile des zeitgenössischen Jazz präsentiert.
Key services
Jazzfestivalveranstaltung, Ticketverkauf, Künstlervermittlung, Medien- und Pressearbeit
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, jQuery UI 1.11.4, Foundation framework, Lightbox plugin, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics IP anonymization
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailChimp newsletter subscription form
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German with multi-language support.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented with GDPR compliance.
  4. No explicit security headers found in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  5. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain without privacy protection.
  6. Multiple partner domains linked, indicating a network of regional sponsors and collaborators.
  7. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization for privacy.
  8. Newsletter subscription uses MailChimp with standard fields.
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, jQuery UI, and the Foundation CSS framework, indicating a traditional but stable front-end stack. The inclusion of lightbox and countdown plugins adds interactive elements. Hosting appears stable with a reputable registrar and multiple DNS servers, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in loading times and script management. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and language support. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with suedtiroljazzfestival.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review suedtiroljazzfestival.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.