Skip to main content

Security report for sudtirol360.it

Flyeye · Hospitality · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Virtual Südtirol is a small hospitality-focused business offering augmented reality virtual tours of the Alto Adige region in Italy. The company, branded as Flyeye, provides immersive virtual experiences to tourists and hospitality clients to enhance travel planning and marketing efforts. The website is professionally designed using Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro and integrates modern analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Analytics, with GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies in place. Contact information is clearly presented, including a contact form, phone number, email, and physical address in Meran, Italy. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sudtirol360.it

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche tourism marketing segment, leveraging augmented reality technology to differentiate its offerings. Its partnerships with Marco Bonatta Photography and Sigrid Frei indicate a collaborative ecosystem focused on regional promotion. The business model centers on providing virtual tours to hotels and tourism destinations, enhancing visitor engagement and trip planning. The website's content and structure support a target audience of tourists and hospitality stakeholders, with multiple virtual tour examples and multimedia content. The company appears to maintain a good market position within its regional niche, though the lack of WHOIS data may affect trust perceptions.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements form validation and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and SSL/TLS configuration details are unknown. The absence of a published security policy or incident response information suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party analytics scripts introduces moderate tracking but is balanced by privacy compliance efforts. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced with additional security headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Conduct an SSL/TLS audit to ensure strong encryption and up-to-date certificate configurations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider clarifying domain registration details or using WHOIS privacy protection transparently to improve legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Flyeye
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flyeye
Description
Virtual Südtirol offers augmented reality virtual tours of the Alto Adige (South Tyrol) region, showcasing cities, valleys, and attractions to help visitors plan trips and relive experiences.
Key services
Augmented reality virtual tours, Tourism marketing tools, Custom virtual tour creation for hotels and regions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2025.2.8, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • Form validation with mandatory fields and email validation
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive virtual tours.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS database, which is unusual.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  6. Use of modern analytics tools (Matomo and Google Analytics) with cookie consent.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but HTTPS URLs used.
  8. Website built with Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2025.2.8 CMS.
  9. Content is tourism-focused, safe, and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Incomedia WebSite X5 Pro 2025.2.8, utilizing jQuery and Modernizr for frontend functionality. It integrates Matomo and Google Analytics for visitor tracking and performance insights. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility features are basic but present, such as skip links and ARIA roles. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses iframe embeds for virtual tours and pop-up windows for external content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a solid user experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sudtirol360.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sudtirol360.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.