Skip to main content

Security report for studiostudio.film

Studio Studio B.V. · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio Studio B.V. is a small creative film production company based in Amsterdam, specializing in visually striking branded films, commercials, and storytelling for ambitious brands worldwide. Their website showcases a professional portfolio of video projects and highlights their expertise in branded content production. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, GSAP animations, and Vimeo video embeds to deliver a high-quality user experience. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits domain registration transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and secure forms, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvements. Contact information is primarily via social media and a newsletter subscription form, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for mobile users, serving its niche market effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studiostudio.film

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Studio Studio operates in the media sector, focusing on creative film production for brands. Their business model revolves around producing high-quality branded films and commercials, targeting ambitious brands globally. The company leverages a portfolio-driven approach to attract clients and maintains active social media channels for marketing and engagement. The presence of a Dutch company registration number (KvK) supports legitimacy. The company appears to be small-sized with no public parent or subsidiary relationships. Their use of modern web technologies and multimedia content indicates a digitally mature operation. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security policies suggests potential compliance gaps that could affect client trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure form submission methods, which are fundamental security practices. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels indicates limited transparency in security incident handling. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  4. Include direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and enhancing meta tags for better search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Studio Studio B.V.
Registration number
84708077
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Studio Studio B.V.
Description
Studio Studio creates visually striking branded films, commercials, and stories for ambitious brands. Based in Amsterdam, working worldwide.
Key services
Branded films, Commercials, Storytelling videos
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Lenis smooth scrolling, Swiper slider, GSAP animations, jQuery 3.5.1, Vimeo video embeds
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp (newsletter subscription)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy protection or registrar restrictions.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is limited to social media and a newsletter form; no direct emails or phone numbers.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and good mobile optimization.
  6. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info present.
  8. Active social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn.
  9. Company registration number (KvK) is displayed in footer.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and uses modern JavaScript libraries including GSAP for animations, Swiper for sliders, and Lenis for smooth scrolling. Video content is embedded via Vimeo with lazy loading and intersection observer for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and custom viewport height calculations for better UX on mobile devices. Performance is fast with CDN-hosted assets and minimal blocking scripts. Accessibility is good with focus management and keyboard navigation considerations. SEO is basic with meta tags but lacks structured data and sitemap references. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and well-executed, supporting a high-quality user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studiostudio.film. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studiostudio.film.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.