Skip to main content

Security report for studiosisi.com

studio sisi · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio Sisi is a small creative branding and illustration studio specializing in designing identities and illustrations for emerging and evolving brands. The website presents a professional portfolio showcasing various case studies in branding, art direction, print, packaging, and web design. The business targets niche creative clients seeking bespoke brand identity services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Semplice theme, with modern web technologies including jQuery and integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with Yoast SEO plugin. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Contact is available via a web form only, with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studiosisi.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention studiosisi.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for studiosisi.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Studio Sisi operates in the media sector focusing on branding and illustration services. The business model is service-based, targeting emerging brands needing creative identity solutions. The company leverages a portfolio-driven approach to attract clients, showcasing detailed case studies. The domain is relatively new (2024) but content dates back to 2021, indicating possible domain migration or rebranding. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company uses standard web analytics and SEO tools but lacks formal privacy and security policies, which may impact trust with privacy-conscious clients. No social media or direct contact information is publicly linked, which may limit outreach. The firm appears to be a small, specialized creative agency with a focused market niche.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections that prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The site lacks published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are important for security transparency and readiness. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking but no cookie consent mechanism was found, raising privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding direct contact information such as company email and phone number to improve business credibility and client trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
studio sisi
Description
We design identities and illustrations for emerging and evolving brands.
Key services
Brand Identity, Art Direction, Illustration, Print, Packaging, Web, Creative Direction, Experience Design, Graphics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Semplice Theme, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Semplice theme.
  2. Content is focused on branding and illustration services for emerging brands.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact is available only via a contact page form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML response.
  7. Domain is newly registered in 2024 but website content dates back to 2021, suggesting content migration or domain change.
  8. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Semplice 6.2.6 theme, a modern and professional creative portfolio theme. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for tracking. Fonts are served via Typekit and self-hosted OTF/WOFF files. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin version 23.7. The hosting provider is GoDaddy.com, LLC, as indicated by the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. No broken links or errors were detected in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small creative agency website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studiosisi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studiosisi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.