Skip to main content

Security report for studionaam.com

Studio Naam · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio Naam is a creative and digital design agency based in the Netherlands, established in 2010. The company specializes in delivering bold, award-winning brand identities, websites, and user-centric digital products tailored for ambitious companies and brands worldwide. Their market position is that of a boutique, highly professional agency with a strong emphasis on strategy-led design and collaboration. The website reflects a modern, well-structured digital presence built on WordPress, utilizing popular JavaScript libraries and SEO best practices. The technical infrastructure is solid, hosted by Naamhosting, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studionaam.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Studio Naam operates in the media sector as a creative agency focusing on digital and brand design services. Their business model revolves around project-based engagements with ambitious brands seeking innovative digital experiences. The company leverages a strong portfolio and social media presence to attract clients. Their key services include UX/UI design, brand identity, app design, and campaign creation. The agency targets medium to large companies looking for strategic and creative partnerships. The domain age and WHOIS data support a stable and legitimate business operation. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent agency. The company maintains a consistent brand image and content quality, which supports client trust and market credibility.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer protection, which are fundamental security measures. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could limit the company's readiness to handle security incidents or data breaches. The use of third-party analytics and scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with no critical vulnerabilities detected but with clear opportunities for strengthening defenses and compliance transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and enhance privacy compliance by documenting data retention policies and user rights clearly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Studio Naam
Description
Naam is creative & digital design agency offering bold award-winning brand identities, websites, and user centric digital products for ambitious companies.
Key services
Brand identities, Websites, User centric digital products, App design, Campaign creation, Identity and branding
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Flickity, Slick Carousel, Typed.js, LazySizes, Object-Fit-Images
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. Clear and accessible contact information with email and phone.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism present and GDPR privacy policy available.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  6. Domain registration data supports legitimacy and business history.
  7. Use of multiple third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Tag Manager.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Flickity, Slick Carousel, Typed.js, and LazySizes for performance and user experience enhancements. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, ensuring proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for search engines. Hosting is provided by Naamhosting, with domain registration through Key-Systems GmbH. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but security headers and DNSSEC are missing, representing modernization opportunities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studionaam.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studionaam.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.