Skip to main content

Security report for stuart.energy

Stuart Energy · Energy · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stuart Energy is a Lithuania-based company specializing in EV charging management solutions, targeting charge point operators, charging station integrators, and commercial fleet managers. Their offerings include a cloud-based EV charging management platform, hardware such as the STUART Car Charger, and a mobile app for drivers. The company positions itself as innovative, future-proof, and economical, with a focus on scalability and interoperability. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image supported by partnerships with notable industry players. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Weglot for multilingual support. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and basic accessibility features. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms but lacks some security headers and published policies, which are recommended for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection and malformed WHOIS responses, which slightly reduces trust but is common for tech companies. No critical security vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and professionally managed, though improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are advised.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stuart.energy

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
88
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stuart Energy operates in the growing EV charging market, providing integrated hardware and software solutions to streamline charging infrastructure management. Their business model is B2B SaaS combined with hardware sales, targeting operators and integrators who require scalable and interoperable solutions. The company leverages partnerships with established hardware brands to enhance credibility and market reach. Their use of HubSpot for demos and active social media presence indicates a focus on customer engagement and lead generation. The absence of detailed company registration data online suggests a small to medium enterprise with a focus on innovation and niche market penetration in the energy and transportation sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap for security transparency. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, impacting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by adding formal policies, security headers, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance site security.
  3. Add an incident response page or contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Include data protection officer contact information or privacy contact details to comply with data protection regulations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stuart Energy
Description
EV charging management solutions for CPOs, installers, and businesses. The platform helps charge point operators reduce costs and increase profits through remote management, custom fees, load balancing, and energy management. It also supports charging station integrators and commercial fleet management with scalable and interoperable solutions.
Key services
EV charging management platform, STUART Car Charger hardware, STUART mobile app for drivers, Remote hardware management and monitoring, Load balancing and energy optimization, Cloud-based CRM and billing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Oswald, Work Sans, Raleway), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Weglot (translation service), jQuery 3.5.1
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot (meeting scheduling)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is limited to email and contact form; no phone or physical address found.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools is evident.
  6. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities detected in the content.
  7. Strong branding and partner logos enhance trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow, a modern CMS platform, using Google Fonts and popular analytics/tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is multilingual via Weglot, indicating internationalization readiness. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features but overall is well-structured and professional. Technical risks are low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended to reduce potential operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stuart.energy. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stuart.energy.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.