Skip to main content

Security report for strelnieku4b.lv

Hepsor · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hepsor is a real estate development company focused on delivering modern residential properties in Riga, Latvia, exemplified by the Strelnieku 4b project. The website showcases their offerings of 1-2 room apartments with quality finishes in a prestigious and quiet city center location, targeting investors, home buyers, and renters. The company positions itself as a reputable developer with a professional online presence and clear contact channels. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with UIkit framework, integrating multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is good with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA protection on forms, and privacy policies in place, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain trust assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching strelnieku4b.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on residential property development and sales in Riga. Their business model includes direct sales, investment opportunities, and rental management services. The target market includes urban residents, investors, and short-term renters. The website content and structure reflect a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and strong trust signals such as privacy policies and contact transparency. The presence of social media and marketing tools suggests active engagement with potential customers. The lack of WHOIS data limits verification of domain age and registrant details, but the professional presentation and clear contact information support legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA v3 protecting user input forms. Email addresses are obfuscated to reduce spam risk. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap in transparency. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could improve header configurations and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all extensions to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate hidden risks.
  5. Enhance data retention and privacy disclosures to align with evolving GDPR and data protection standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hepsor
Description
Hepsor develops and sells residential real estate properties, specifically the Strelnieku 4b project in Riga, Latvia, offering 1-2 room apartments with quality finishing in a quiet city center location.
Key services
Apartment sales, Investment opportunities, Rental management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Yootheme Pro, UIkit, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Frameworks
UIkit
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of hidden email obfuscation
  • Use of security and privacy policies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Uses Joomla CMS with modern UIkit framework and multiple analytics/tracking tools.
  3. Includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, physical addresses, and contact forms.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No data protection officer contact found.
  10. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Yootheme Pro template and UIkit framework, leveraging jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. Performance is moderate with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some security headers are missing. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly real estate marketing platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with strelnieku4b.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review strelnieku4b.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.