Skip to main content

Security report for streets-heaver.com

Streets Heaver · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Streets Heaver is a UK-based company specializing in private healthcare software solutions, prominently featuring their flagship product, Compucare. The company targets private hospital groups, independent hospitals, clinics, and NHS units, offering a comprehensive suite of software modules to manage patient administration, billing, referrals, and clinical workflows. Their market position is that of a leading provider in the private healthcare software sector, supported by a professional website with client trust signals and modern digital marketing tools. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with integrations for analytics and cookie consent, showing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and business presentation are professional and consistent. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and business credibility but should improve transparency on privacy, security policies, and domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching streets-heaver.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare software sector, focusing on private healthcare providers and NHS units. Their business model revolves around software licensing, cloud hosting, and integration services. The presence of multiple product modules and client logos indicates a mature product ecosystem and established client base. The website's use of marketing tools like Mailchimp and Google Analytics suggests active customer engagement and lead generation efforts. The lack of explicit company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business verification. The domain's WHOIS data absence is unusual and should be investigated to confirm ownership and legitimacy. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focused sector presence in the UK healthcare market.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs were found, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and ensure compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Streets Heaver
Description
Streets Heaver provides leading private healthcare software, Compucare, to improve how you can share, sync, manage and bill private patients.
Key services
Compucare PAS/EPR, Cloud Hosting on Azure, Report Generator, NHS e-Referral Service, Patient Portal, MessageCall, Compucare Clinician, NIVA, Compucare Ward, Compucare Integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Mailchimp, Termly Cookie Consent, Slick Carousel
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA script (though deferred and async)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based private healthcare software provider site.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at healthcare industry clients.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. Contact phone number is clearly displayed with UK dialing code.
  8. Multiple client logos displayed indicating trust signals.
  9. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Mailchimp for marketing automation. The site uses a responsive design with good mobile optimization and accessibility basics. Performance is moderate with some deferred scripts and optimized images. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure or a similar cloud platform, inferred from service references. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses a cookie consent banner powered by Termly, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and WHOIS domain registration transparency are areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with streets-heaver.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review streets-heaver.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.