Skip to main content

Security report for streamin.co

Streamin · Media · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Streamin.co is a specialized streaming search engine designed to help users discover where to watch movies and TV shows across multiple streaming platforms. It offers key services such as streaming availability search, alert notifications, and AI-powered recommendations. The platform targets a general audience interested in streaming entertainment content and positions itself as a niche media discovery tool. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including Next.js and React, with integration of PostHog analytics and data sourced from TMDb and JustWatch. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and published security or incident response policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of streamin.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching streamin.co

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Streamin.co operates in the media sector as a streaming guide and search engine. Its business model revolves around providing free access to streaming availability data and personalized recommendations, likely monetized through partnerships or affiliate links. The company maintains a small but focused presence, with clear branding and consistent messaging. Its partnership ecosystem includes data providers like TMDb and JustWatch, and it leverages third-party services for uptime monitoring and climate initiatives. The platform's growth potential lies in expanding user engagement through alerts and AI recommendations. However, the absence of phone contact and limited public business details suggest a lean operation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. The use of PostHog analytics indicates attention to privacy, with options for explicit consent and limited profile creation. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The site would benefit from formalizing these aspects to enhance trust and compliance, especially under GDPR and similar regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Expand contact options to include phone or dedicated security contact emails for incident reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security documentation to maintain compliance and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Streamin
Description
Streamin is your ultimate streaming guide, designed to help you discover where to watch any movie or TV show across all your favorite streaming platforms. Easily search for any title to see its availability, or set up alerts to be notified as soon as it’s ready to stream.
Key services
Streaming availability search, Alerts for new streaming availability, AI-powered movie and TV show recommendations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, PostHog analytics, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security), TMDb API integration, JustWatch and Streaming Availability data sources
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused analytics (PostHog with consent options)

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Clear and comprehensive privacy and terms pages present
  3. Contact information limited to email only, no phone or physical address found
  4. Modern tech stack with Next.js and PostHog analytics
  5. Good SEO and mobile optimization
  6. No explicit or adult content detected
  7. No visible cookie consent mechanism
  8. No published security policy or incident response info
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

Streamin.co is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The integration of PostHog analytics provides advanced user behavior tracking with privacy considerations. The site uses CDN and security services likely provided by Cloudflare, enhancing performance and security. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom-built solution, which may require ongoing maintenance to avoid technical debt. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and user-friendly streaming discovery platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium35 findingsView report
  2. 63/100 −4Medium36 findingsView report
  3. 67/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with streamin.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review streamin.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.