Skip to main content

Security report for streamfood.tv

Ralf M. Mendle - Mediendienstleistungen · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

streamfood.tv is a media streaming platform founded in 2020 and operated by Ralf M. Mendle - Mediendienstleistungen based in Germany. The platform offers a variety of cultural content including events, shows, interviews, and documentaries across genres such as comedy, music, literature, science, and politics. It targets a general audience interested in fair and transparent media consumption. The business model centers on streaming content with a focus on fair revenue sharing. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies including the Elixir Phoenix framework, Video.js for video playback, and Tailwind CSS for styling. Hosting is provided by Vautron Rechenzentrum AG, with DNS managed via Google Domains. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and search functionality. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection, but lacks important security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. Contact and security incident response information are not provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business claims. Recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching streamfood.tv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention streamfood.tv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for streamfood.tv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector with a niche focus on fair and share-based streaming content. Its competitive advantage lies in transparent revenue sharing and curated cultural content. The platform serves a diverse audience interested in entertainment and educational media. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions or pay-per-view for events and shows. The company appears small but professional, with a consistent brand and quality content. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth potential exists through content expansion and improved compliance. The ecosystem includes modern web technologies and error monitoring via Sentry. Strategic observations suggest a need for enhanced privacy and security practices to align with regulatory requirements and build user trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens implemented. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor risk in DNS spoofing. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact reduces preparedness for security events. Privacy compliance gaps exist, notably missing privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The use of Sentry for error tracking is a positive indicator but should be complemented with clear data handling disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ralf M. Mendle - Mediendienstleistungen
Description
The Fair & Share Company! Streaming platform offering events and shows with a focus on fair and transparent revenue sharing.
Key services
Streaming of events, Streaming of shows, Search functionality for content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Elixir Phoenix Framework, Video.js, Glider.js, Tailwind CSS, Google Domains DNS
Frameworks
Phoenix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a media streaming platform with a focus on fair revenue sharing
  2. Content includes events and shows in categories like comedy, music, literature, science, and politics
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  4. No explicit contact information or security policies found
  5. Modern tech stack with Elixir Phoenix and video streaming libraries
  6. Good HTTPS usage but missing security headers and DNSSEC
  7. Minimal tracking limited to Sentry error monitoring
  8. No adult or explicit content detected
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and transparent
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring the Elixir Phoenix framework, which supports real-time features and scalability. Video.js is used for media playback, and Glider.js provides carousel functionality. Styling is managed with Tailwind CSS, ensuring responsive design. Hosting is with Vautron Rechenzentrum AG, a reputable German provider. DNS is managed via Google Domains but lacks DNSSEC. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile optimized. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but could be enhanced. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site uses Sentry for error monitoring, indicating attention to operational stability. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance, which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with streamfood.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review streamfood.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.